Contemporary political theory has made the question of the "people" a topic of sustained analysis. This article identifies two broad approaches taken-norm-based and contestation-based-and, noting some problems left outstanding, goes on to advance a complementary account centred on partisan practice. It suggests the definition of "the people" is closely bound up in the analysis of political conflict, and that partisans engaged in such conflict play an essential role in constructing and contesting different principled conceptions. The article goes on to show how such an account does not lead to a normatively hollow, purely historical conception of "the people," but rather highlights the normative importance of practices that, at the minimum, de-naturalise undesirable conceptions of the people and, at their best, give political legitimacy and a representative basis to those one might wish to see prosper.
Keywords democratic theory, partisanship, peopleIn democratic theory and practice, the concept of the people is used to evoke that agent in the name of whom power should be exercised if it is to be considered justified. Yet what a people is and how it can be legitimately constituted is a matter of enduring dispute. If we follow the larger part of democratic