1992
DOI: 10.1002/for.3980110809
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sign of the optimal combining weights under the error‐variance minimizing criterion

Abstract: Building on the well-known measure of the optimal combining weights under the error-variance minimizing criterion, this note has extended the sign-determination rule to the case of combining more than two competing forecasts. The algebraic rule derived provides a quick way to check the sign of each combining weight without directly comparing the correlation and variances of individual forecasting errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among methods of combining forecasts (Liang, 1992), the formula (2) proposed by Reid (1969), Dickinson (1973) or Newbold & Granger (1974) is perhaps the single most extensively used measure of the optimal weights. Despite the popularity of this formula, very little is known about the sampling properties of its estimator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among methods of combining forecasts (Liang, 1992), the formula (2) proposed by Reid (1969), Dickinson (1973) or Newbold & Granger (1974) is perhaps the single most extensively used measure of the optimal weights. Despite the popularity of this formula, very little is known about the sampling properties of its estimator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%