1981
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Significance of Amplitude Studies in Shallow Refraction Seismics*

Abstract: An analysis of amplitudes of refraction records of some shallow refraction profiles shot primarily for detailing the near-surface structure in a granitic terrain has yielded information on refractor properties: reduced amplitudes are plotted on amplitude-distance graphs. The negative power n to which distance should be raised to represent (elastic) amplitude decay with respect to distance due to spreading of the critically refracted wave involved is examined. Computed values of this "spreading index" n are clo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For long offsets, where the distance traveled along the refractor exceeds several wavelengths, the head wave amplitude decreases by a factor close to the inverse square of the offset (e.g., Muskat, 1933;Heelan, 1953;O'Brien, 1955O'Brien, , 1957O'Brien, , 1967aKumar and Raghava, 1981). At smaller offsets, which is likely to be the case for many LVL surveys, the amplitude decrease with offset is slightly less (e.g., Levin and Ingram, 1962;Donato, 1964Donato, , 1965Hatherly, 1982a).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Shape and Amplitude Of Refraction Arrivalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For long offsets, where the distance traveled along the refractor exceeds several wavelengths, the head wave amplitude decreases by a factor close to the inverse square of the offset (e.g., Muskat, 1933;Heelan, 1953;O'Brien, 1955O'Brien, , 1957O'Brien, , 1967aKumar and Raghava, 1981). At smaller offsets, which is likely to be the case for many LVL surveys, the amplitude decrease with offset is slightly less (e.g., Levin and Ingram, 1962;Donato, 1964Donato, , 1965Hatherly, 1982a).…”
Section: Factors Affecting Shape and Amplitude Of Refraction Arrivalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For extent layer with constant velocity the decay in amplitude of the refracted wave is found from the following relation (Kumar & Raghava, 1981).…”
Section: Geometrical Spreading Factor (N)mentioning
confidence: 99%