2021
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2021.1890872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the significance of disciplinary variation in research articles: Perspectives from nominalization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, the use of verb (process) to noun (entity) outnumbered the use of adjective (quality) to noun (entity) in both corpora (LERAIs: 198 (76.2%) vs. LIRAIs: 315 (76.3%). This finding is in line with Mehrabi, et al (2018) and Kaidan, Jalilifar, & Don (2018) who postulated that those two kinds were prevalent in texts and verb to noun dominates the other types. More specifically, verbs have suffixes added to become nouns predominated the other types of verb to noun and verbs change their stems to become nouns represented the least frequently used type of verb to noun across both corpora (LERAIs: 41 (20.7%) vs. LIRAIs: 79 (25.1%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, the use of verb (process) to noun (entity) outnumbered the use of adjective (quality) to noun (entity) in both corpora (LERAIs: 198 (76.2%) vs. LIRAIs: 315 (76.3%). This finding is in line with Mehrabi, et al (2018) and Kaidan, Jalilifar, & Don (2018) who postulated that those two kinds were prevalent in texts and verb to noun dominates the other types. More specifically, verbs have suffixes added to become nouns predominated the other types of verb to noun and verbs change their stems to become nouns represented the least frequently used type of verb to noun across both corpora (LERAIs: 41 (20.7%) vs. LIRAIs: 79 (25.1%).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, there was no significant difference in the lexical density of the introduction sections of the two datasets. In contrast, Kaidan, Jalilifar, & Don (2018) who identified occurrences of nominalization in different types of RAs in physics and AL found that the writers in AL used nominalization more frequently than their counterparts in physics. Also, their analysis showed that the deployment of the second type of nominalization (verb Hinkel (2004b) examined the usage of tenses, aspects (perfect/progressive) and the passive voice in academic texts written by NESs and NNESs.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Therefore, the Red Book is adopted to specify relevant details and define the boundaries of rights and obligations of the stakeholders. Nouns and nominalizations are also deemed efficient devices for presenting the key issues (Chen et al, 2018), which can condense information directly and explicitly (Kaidan et al, 2021). Furthermore, nouns and nominalizations can increase the degree of formality and authority of the General Conditions (Liu, 2008;Orts, 2015;Heidari Kaidan et al, 2021).…”
Section: Nouns and Nominalizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%