2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-0072-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Significance of Nature of Strain-Induced Martensite on Phase-Reversion-Induced Nanograined/Ultrafine-Grained Austenitic Stainless Steel

Abstract: We recently described the reversal of strain-induced martensite to the parent austenite phase in the attempt to produce nanograins/ultrafine grains via controlled annealing of heavily cold-worked metastable austenite. The phase-reversion-induced microstructure consisted of nanocrystalline (d<100 nm), ultrafine (d % 100 to 500 nm), and submicron (d % 500 to 1000 nm) grains and was characterized by high strength (800 to 1000 MPa)-high ductility (30 to 40 pct) combination, which was a function of cold deformation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The annealing experiments were carried out on strips of 120 Â 25 mm (thickness $0.6 mm). The phase reversion process is described in detail elsewhere [9][10][11][12]. Room temperature tensile properties were determined using specimens that were machined to a profile of 25 Â 25 mm with a 20 mm gage length.…”
Section: Experimental: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The annealing experiments were carried out on strips of 120 Â 25 mm (thickness $0.6 mm). The phase reversion process is described in detail elsewhere [9][10][11][12]. Room temperature tensile properties were determined using specimens that were machined to a profile of 25 Â 25 mm with a 20 mm gage length.…”
Section: Experimental: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But the differences between the two methods were observed to be small, suggesting that either of the two methods were appropriate in our case. The weighted average grain size ( d w ) of CG steel was 22 lm, while that of NG steel (cold rolled to 62% reduction and annealed at 800°C for 10 s) was 225 nm [9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Starting Microstructure and Strain-rate Sensitivity Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations