2019
DOI: 10.1109/lra.2019.2891085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Similarities and Differences Among Contact Models in Robot Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rigid-body models of dynamics and contact (see Stewart [38] or Brogliato [4] for an overview) are widely used in robotics, as they can lead to far more tractable methods than approaches which explicitly attempt to capture the stiff interaction between objects. These approaches have also led to complementarity-based simulation schemes, such as [1,10,16,22,36,37] and others. Recent research, using complementarity models, has also been conducted into multi-contact optimal planning [25,27,28] and control [15,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rigid-body models of dynamics and contact (see Stewart [38] or Brogliato [4] for an overview) are widely used in robotics, as they can lead to far more tractable methods than approaches which explicitly attempt to capture the stiff interaction between objects. These approaches have also led to complementarity-based simulation schemes, such as [1,10,16,22,36,37] and others. Recent research, using complementarity models, has also been conducted into multi-contact optimal planning [25,27,28] and control [15,29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some others approaches [18] relax the complementarity constraint in order to transform the frictional contact problem into a single and simple optimization one [12]. However, this relaxation may lead to physically implausible behaviors such as object interactions without objects being in contact [13]. In this paper, we extend the formulation in [15] to laws of multiple elastic collisions [19].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4c). It is worth noting that the simulated trajectories were generated with an algorithm (PGS-NCP from [13]) and a time step different from the ones of the differentiable simulator used for the inference, and that we also added white noise (variance of 10 −3 m) to make sure that results from simulations do not depend on the way trajectories are simulated.…”
Section: B Physical Parameters Inference From Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Next, we follow a similar treatment with time-stepping approaches, e.g. [22], [23]. Equation (1) is discretized using an Euler approximation to obtain the discrete version…”
Section: A Dynamics With Contactsmentioning
confidence: 99%