2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the social value of publicly disclosed information and environmental regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The supervision of pollution behavior of industrial enterprises by the government is often quarterly or annual static detection, rather than real-time dynamic monitoring. In addition, the low degree of informatization of environmental supervision and the low degree of public participation make it difficult for environmental policies to achieve the desired results (Elnaboulsi et al, 2018). The main purpose of EID measures is to standardize and promote the environmental protection administrative departments and enterprises to disclose environmental information, ensure the rights of citizens and society to obtain environmental information, and promote public participation and environmental protection.…”
Section: Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The supervision of pollution behavior of industrial enterprises by the government is often quarterly or annual static detection, rather than real-time dynamic monitoring. In addition, the low degree of informatization of environmental supervision and the low degree of public participation make it difficult for environmental policies to achieve the desired results (Elnaboulsi et al, 2018). The main purpose of EID measures is to standardize and promote the environmental protection administrative departments and enterprises to disclose environmental information, ensure the rights of citizens and society to obtain environmental information, and promote public participation and environmental protection.…”
Section: Research Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most scholars hold the view that strict environmental regulation is conducive to reducing pollutant emissions and substantially improving air quality [13], while some scholars support an inverse U-shaped relationship between environmental regulation and air quality, with the significant sign shifting from positive to negative [14]. The inconsistent results give rise to a number of subsequent studies on the variance in the effectiveness of specific regulatory instruments like environmental legislations, environmental levies and violation penalties [15][16][17]. However, the remaining problem is that those studies focus mainly on measures targeted at restraining enterprises' pollution behaviors, with little discussion devoted to regulatory instruments conducted to prompt local governments' environmental enforcement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We collected the email addresses of treated companies from their websites and annual reports. The companies who received the communication letter believed that their EID compliance information was more likely to be seen by the government; thus, they were exposed to regulatory pressure from the top down (Elnaboulsi et al, 2018;Foulon et al, 2002;Olken, 2007). Reporting information to the government has also been commonly used in the literature on the impact of citizen oversight as a strategy to measure regulatory pressure (e.g., Bernedo Del Carpio et al, 2021;Christensen et al, 2021;Cooperman et al, 2021;Danielsen et al, 2010;Eisenbarth et al, 2021;Slough et al, 2021aSlough et al, , 2021b.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%