2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10589-015-9795-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the solution of convex bilevel optimization problems

Abstract: An algorithm is presented for solving bilevel optimization problems with fully convex lower level problems. Convergence to a local optimal solution is shown under certain weak assumptions. This algorithm uses the optimal value transformation of the problem. Transformation of the bilevel optimization problem using the FritzJohn necessary optimality conditions applied to the lower level problem is shown to exhibit almost the same difficulties for solving the problem as the use of the KarushKuhn-Tucker conditions. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(ii) Relations (9), (11) and (12) follow from (4) and the fact that w * ∈ U , g(x * , w * ) ≤ 0 and f (x * , w * ) = f (x * , y * ). Moreover, (20) implies (10)…”
Section: Global Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(ii) Relations (9), (11) and (12) follow from (4) and the fact that w * ∈ U , g(x * , w * ) ≤ 0 and f (x * , w * ) = f (x * , y * ). Moreover, (20) implies (10)…”
Section: Global Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter problems are structurally nonconvex and nonsmooth (see [8]); furthermore, it is hard to define suitable constraint qualification conditions for them, see, e.g., [12,37]. In fact, the study of provably convergent and practically implementable algorithms for the solution of even just SBPs is still in its infancy (see, for example, [3,6,9,10,25,27,30,33,35,36,39]), as also witnessed by the scarcity of results in the literature. We remark that suitable reformulations of the SBP have been proposed in order to investigate optimality conditions and constraint qualifications, as well as to devise suitable algorithmic approaches: to date, the most studied and promising are optimal value and KKT one level reformulations (see [13], the references therein and [29,38]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Dempe and Franke (2016) lower-level problems are replaced with their Fritz-John conditions (John 1948), and an algorithm is presented for solving problems with fully convex lower-levels. This method is applied in Dempe and Franke (2014) to solve a bilevel road pricing problem. Nogales Martín and Miguel (2004) show a relationship between one bilevel decomposition algorithm and a direct interior-point method based on Newton's method.…”
Section: Decomposition Approaches In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning the parameter of end-to-end trainable rank pooled CNN Now we present how to learn the parameters of the CNN (θ ) and the classifier parameters. Consider again the learning problem defined in Equation 10. The derivative with respect to β , which only appears in the upper-level problem, is straightforward and well known.…”
Section: 3mentioning
confidence: 99%