2015
DOI: 10.12732/ijpam.v98i4.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Solutions of Non-Linear Time-Fractional Gas Dynamic Equations: An Analytical Approach

Abstract: We consider non-linear homogeneous and non-homogeneous gas dynamic equations of time-fractional type in this paper. The approximate solutions of these equations are calculated in the form of series obtained by q-Homotopy Analysis Method (q-HAM). Exact solution is obtained for timefractional homogeneous case while for the case of time-fractional non-homogeneous, exact solution is possible for special case. This is due to the ability to control the auxiliary parameter h and the fraction factor present in this me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The search for a better way to expand the convergence region led to the modification of HAM, called q-HAM, more of a general method than HAM [48]. Many authors have taken advantage of q-HAM and used it to solve nonlinear fractional partial differential equations [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The q-HATM was proposed by Singh et al [56] and did not require any form of discretization, linearization, or perturbation as compared to other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search for a better way to expand the convergence region led to the modification of HAM, called q-HAM, more of a general method than HAM [48]. Many authors have taken advantage of q-HAM and used it to solve nonlinear fractional partial differential equations [49][50][51][52][53][54][55]. The q-HATM was proposed by Singh et al [56] and did not require any form of discretization, linearization, or perturbation as compared to other methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though every model should seek to use fractional calculus when introducing a new model, solving such model is known to be very difficult and required strong numerical or analytical techniques. Some of the methods used in the literature are homotopy perturbation method [17][18][19][20][21], Laplace analysis method [22], homotopy analysis method [23][24][25][26][27], Adomian decomposition method [28], differential transformation method [29], perturbation-iteration algorithm [30], iterative Shehu transform method [31], residual power series method [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and q-homotopy analysis transform method in [41][42][43][44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods used in obtaining approximate solutions to linear and nonlinear FPDE such as the Adomian decomposition method (ADM) [28,29], the homotopyperturbation method (HPM) [30][31][32][33][34], the variational iteration method (VIM) [35], the q-homotopy analysis transform method (q-HATM) [36,37], the fractional natural decomposition method (FNDM) [38], the fractional multi-step differential transformed method (FMsDTM) [39], the new iterartive method (NIM) [40][41][42] and the homotopy analysis method (HAM) [43][44][45][46]. In a recent development, [47][48][49][50][51][52][53], a modified homotopy analysis method was established which has potential applications in a wide range of systems of differential equations. This method provides a convenient way to ascertain the convergence of approximation series and even exact solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%