2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2008.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the solvability of closest point projection procedures in contact analysis: Analysis and solution strategy for surfaces of arbitrary geometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, a closest point projection is used in some cases, which, however, may not be uniquely defined everywhere; see e.g. [37] for a discussion on the solvability of closest point projections. Analogously to the kinematic quantities above, the slave side contact traction is split into a normal and tangential component:…”
Section: Problem Definition Of Finite Deformation Frictional Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, a closest point projection is used in some cases, which, however, may not be uniquely defined everywhere; see e.g. [37] for a discussion on the solvability of closest point projections. Analogously to the kinematic quantities above, the slave side contact traction is split into a normal and tangential component:…”
Section: Problem Definition Of Finite Deformation Frictional Contactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the finite element method requires only continuity of the discretization (Γ c ∈ C 0 ) so the contacting surface may be not smooth (Γ c ∈ C 1 ). Each master segment has its "projection" zone ( Figure 6), each point in this zone has at least one projection onto the master surface [7,8]. But often in the junction zone of master segments (at common edges and nodes) the intersections of "projection" zones does not fill the surrounding space entirely but with some gaps of form of prisms and pyramids in 3D or of form of sectors in 2D.…”
Section: Contact Detectionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For the concave surface AND should be replaced by OR in (13). More elaborated approaches (see, for example, [7]) take into account node-tonode and node-to-edge contacts in case of blind spot detection, average normals can be established at edges and vertices. But for most of the contact problems, consideration of only node-to-segment discretization provides the correct results.…”
Section: Contact Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Problems related to C 0 only surfaces in contact mechanics non-mortar ω (1) mortar ω (2) n (2) Uniqueness of projection As discussed and shown in [2] there are several difficulties for solvability and uniqueness of the closest point projection. One of those issues is shown in figure 2a.…”
Section: Discontinuous Mortar Side Normal Vectors (Figure 1a)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue can be solved by averaging. The problem on boundaries corners and others in [2] discussed problems remain.…”
Section: Discontinuous Mortar Side Normal Vectors (Figure 1a)mentioning
confidence: 99%