1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01942523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the specific attraction of the males of the six-toothed spruce bark beetle,Pityogenes chalcographus (L.) to a mixture of synthetic pheromones of the eight-toothed spruce bark beetle,Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae)

Abstract: Summary. Traps containing a mixture of attractants for Ips typographus also caught other species of bark beetles. The numbers of Pityogenes chalcographus, Pityogenes conjunctus, and Trypodendron lineatum were too high to be interpreted as accidental captures. The males of the polygamous P_ chalcographus were specifically attracted, indicating that the L typographus pheromone or one of its components acts as a kairomone and primary attractant for the pioneering males of P. chalcographus. Key words. Attraction; … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We thus probably overestimate the relative impact of intrinsic phloem decay as compared to inter-specific competition. Specifically, active avoidance by I. typographus of areas colonized by its main competitor, Pityogenes chalcographus, has been described (Benz et al, 1986;Byers, 1993;Hedgren, 2004). This latter species is also known to have a negative effect on the production of I. typographus and is observed on 38-89% of the available hosts (Eriksson et al, 2006;Komonen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…We thus probably overestimate the relative impact of intrinsic phloem decay as compared to inter-specific competition. Specifically, active avoidance by I. typographus of areas colonized by its main competitor, Pityogenes chalcographus, has been described (Benz et al, 1986;Byers, 1993;Hedgren, 2004). This latter species is also known to have a negative effect on the production of I. typographus and is observed on 38-89% of the available hosts (Eriksson et al, 2006;Komonen et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Aggregation pheromones elicit a very specific and often stronger attraction than do host odours, but the electrophysiological basis seems only partly clarified ( T P I M M E~S 1985). Even species not producing aggregation pheromones themselves are reported to respond to kairomones from other beetle species (e.g., HEDDEN et al 1976;WOOD 1982;KOHNLE 1985;BENZ et al 1986;BYERS 1989;T 0 M M E d S et al 1989;PHILLIPS 1990a, b). The bait billets in the present experiment were intentionally shielded from attack, but logs in the surroundings that could be attacked, would after the first attack (boring) result in an increase in the release of host volatiles and by that attractivity, a situation similar to and sometimes misinterpreted as secondary attraction, see discussion in TILLES et al (1986a) and.…”
Section: Statistical Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, P. knechteli exploited the aggregation pheromone of I. pini to aid in host location (Figs. The male to female sex ratio for captured P. chalcographus was much higher than the natural sex ratio; mostly males were captured (Benz et al 1986;Zuber and Benz 1992). The relative response of male P. knechteli to I. pini males was higher than that of females, given a 1:5 sex ratio (Table 1).…”
Section: Interspecific Communication Between I Pini and P Knechtelimentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The relative response of male P. knechteli to I. pini males was higher than that of females, given a 1:5 sex ratio (Table 1). Both species attack windthrown or weakened spruce trees, and resource partitioning could be mediated by the preference of the larger I. typographus for the thick bark of the lower two-thirds of the bole, and of P. chalcographus for younger trees or the crown region of larger trees (Benz et al 1986). There was a relatively greater response by male than female I. pini to P. knechteli males in one instance These results agree with those for the six-spined spruce bark beetle, Pityogenes chalcographus (L.), and the eight-spined spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.), in European spruce trees (Picea spp.).…”
Section: Interspecific Communication Between I Pini and P Knechtelimentioning
confidence: 99%