2021
DOI: 10.1042/bcj20200828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the specificity of protein–protein interactions in the context of disorder

Abstract: With the increased focus on intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) and their large interactomes, the question about their specificity — or more so on their multispecificity — arise. Here we recapitulate how specificity and multispecificity are quantified and address through examples if IDPs in this respect differ from globular proteins. The conclusion is that quantitatively, globular proteins and IDPs are similar when it comes to specificity. However, compared with globular proteins, IDPs have larger interac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
1
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…With the affinities in the 50-100 µM range uncovered in the present work, as well as in previous studies [42,44], it may very well be likely that calcium binding to IDPs may serve regulatory functional roles, which, however, remain to be uncovered. IDPs often engage in multivalent interactions [60], including those leading to liquid-liquid phase separation [61][62][63]. Emerging research shows that phase separation can be regulated by calcium in the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticula to enable efficient calcium buffering [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the affinities in the 50-100 µM range uncovered in the present work, as well as in previous studies [42,44], it may very well be likely that calcium binding to IDPs may serve regulatory functional roles, which, however, remain to be uncovered. IDPs often engage in multivalent interactions [60], including those leading to liquid-liquid phase separation [61][62][63]. Emerging research shows that phase separation can be regulated by calcium in the endoplasmic/sarcoplasmic reticula to enable efficient calcium buffering [64].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amino acid composition of the contact area of two interacting proteins (complex “A–B”) provides molecular recognition specificity [ 28 , 29 ]. Conventionally, it is possible to distinguish mono- or multispecific PPIs when the contact area of protein “A” interacts either strictly with protein “B” or other protein partners, respectively.…”
Section: Main Structural and Biochemical Features Of Ppis’ Interfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties render them malleable and confer functional advantages, one of which is the ability to bind multiple binding partners. 11 , 12 Such binding often occurs by exploitation of minor, limited binding sites constituted by small linear motifs (SLiMs). 4 , 13 The prevalence of disordered proteins in the eukaryotic proteome 3 , 6 , 7 is evidence of their importance in biological processes, but due to their low sequence conservation compared to folded counterparts, 14 , 15 evolutionary links between different IDPs can be difficult to track and thus often relies on functional analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%