2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2013.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the spectral theory of Gesztesy–Šeba realizations of 1-D Dirac operators with point interactions on a discrete set

Abstract: We investigate spectral properties of Gesztesy-Šeba realizations DX,α and D X,β of the 1-D Dirac differential expression D with point interactions on a discrete set X = {xn} ∞ n=1 ⊂ R. Here α := {αn} ∞ n=1 and β := {βn} ∞ n=1 ⊂ R. The Gesztesy-Šeba realizations DX,α and D X,β are the relativistic counterparts of the corresponding Schrödinger operators HX,α and H X,β with δ-and δ ′ -interactions, respectively. We define the minimal operator DX as the direct sum of the minimal Dirac operators on the intervals (x… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
96
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
5
96
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main examples in is the Laplacian on double-struckR with infinitely many delta interactions on it (in other words, Robin‐type perturbations of the Neumann Laplacian on double-struckR, see Remark (ii)), a case also treated in detail in (see Remark 6.1 and also , , for other recent applications of boundary triple methods to delta‐type Schrödinger operators). Brasche et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main examples in is the Laplacian on double-struckR with infinitely many delta interactions on it (in other words, Robin‐type perturbations of the Neumann Laplacian on double-struckR, see Remark (ii)), a case also treated in detail in (see Remark 6.1 and also , , for other recent applications of boundary triple methods to delta‐type Schrödinger operators). Brasche et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recall that, according to (22) we can decompose the form domain Y as the orthogonal sum of the positive and negative spectral subspaces for the operator D, i.e.…”
Section: Existence Of Infinitely Many Bound Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and thus the resolvent of the operator D can be regarded as a perturbation of the resolvent of the operator D 0 . In the above formula γ(·) and M (·) are the gamma-field and the Weyl function, respectively, associated with D (see [22]). It turns out that the operator appearing in the righthand side of (83) is of finite rank.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two δ-perturbation terms with strengths η, τ ∈ R define the electrostatic shell interaction ηI 4 δ Γ and the Lorentz scalar shell interaction τ βδ Γ , respectively. Singular perturbations of the Dirac operator have been introduced first in [25], where the one dimensional Dirac operator with point interactions is considered, see also [3,19,21,36,41] for more results on Dirac operators with point interactions in R. Shell interactions supported on a sphere in R 3 were then introduced in [22] by using the one-dimensional results and a decomposition to spherical harmonics. This problem has been recently reconsidered in [4,5,6], where in the case of a C 2 -surface the self-adjointness and several properties of Dirac operators with electrostatic δ-perturbations are derived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%