2001
DOI: 10.1090/s0025-5718-01-01314-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the stability of the $L^2$ projection in $H^1(\Omega)$

Abstract: We prove the stability in H 1 (Ω) of the L 2 projection onto a family of finite element spaces of conforming piecewise linear functions satisfying certain local mesh conditions. We give explicit formulae to check these conditions for a given finite element mesh in any number of spatial dimensions. In particular, stability of the L 2 projection in H 1 (Ω) holds for locally quasiuniform geometrically refined meshes as long as the volume of neighboring elements does not change too drastically.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
140
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 161 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparatively large values of c 6 in experiments 2 and 4 seem to be caused by the sharp change of the element sizes. This observation is supported by experiment 5 which features a smoother change of the element sizes and reveals smaller values of c 6 . In view of experiment 4, the mesh assumption (A3) and (A4) seem to be of less influence on c 5 and c 6 .…”
Section: Results For Theorem 313supporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The comparatively large values of c 6 in experiments 2 and 4 seem to be caused by the sharp change of the element sizes. This observation is supported by experiment 5 which features a smoother change of the element sizes and reveals smaller values of c 6 . In view of experiment 4, the mesh assumption (A3) and (A4) seem to be of less influence on c 5 and c 6 .…”
Section: Results For Theorem 313supporting
confidence: 66%
“…This observation is supported by experiment 5 which features a smoother change of the element sizes and reveals smaller values of c 6 . In view of experiment 4, the mesh assumption (A3) and (A4) seem to be of less influence on c 5 and c 6 . The global equivalence (3.30) between the residual estimator and the ZZ estimator reads η R ∼ η Z2 .…”
Section: Results For Theorem 313supporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The quasi-uniform assumption on the mesh is used solely to guarantee that the L 2 (Ω r ) projection onto the finite element subspaceÛ h is stable when restricted H 1 (Ω r ). Stability of the projection can established under much weaker restrictions on the mesh geometry [4,6]. In this situation the proof of (3) would proceed directly as in the proof of (1).…”
Section: Lemma 34 Let {T H } H>0 Be a Quasi-regular Family Of Trianmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The H 1 -stability of the L 2 -projection can, however, actually be proven under much weaker conditions on the grids. Partly rather technical sufficient conditions for the H 1 -stability of the L 2 -projection are given in [7][8][9][10]. In [11], the case of piecewise linear elements in two space dimensions is treated.…”
Section: The Rayleigh-ritz Method: Framework and Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%