2022
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93fb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Stability of Tidal Streams in Action Space

Abstract: In the Gaia era it is increasingly apparent that traditional static, parameterized models are insufficient to describe the mass distribution of our complex, dynamically evolving Milky Way (MW). In this work, we compare different time-evolving and time-independent representations of the gravitational potentials of simulated MW-mass galaxies from the FIRE-2 suite of cosmological-baryonic simulations. Using these potentials, we calculate actions for star particles in tidal streams around three galaxies with varyi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The properties of the LMC analogs selected for this work are detailed in Table 2. We emphasize that the distinction in LMC mass ratios is critical, because the mass ratio at pericenter is a key indicator with which a potential can be accurately modeled in terms of axisymmetry, and it may impact the galaxy-halo alignment (Arora et al 2022). In reality, Arora et al (2022) find that the MW-LMC mass ratio is high enough such that loworder axisymmetric multipole modeling is insufficient in describing the galactic potential.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The properties of the LMC analogs selected for this work are detailed in Table 2. We emphasize that the distinction in LMC mass ratios is critical, because the mass ratio at pericenter is a key indicator with which a potential can be accurately modeled in terms of axisymmetry, and it may impact the galaxy-halo alignment (Arora et al 2022). In reality, Arora et al (2022) find that the MW-LMC mass ratio is high enough such that loworder axisymmetric multipole modeling is insufficient in describing the galactic potential.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order to examine the uncertainties on the Milky Way stream orbits due to the assumption of a time-independent potential, we also integrate the orbits of the FIRE streams from the Latte simulations in a time-independent potential. We use the potential models from Arora et al (2022), fit via basis function expansion to the host galaxy potential in each of the Latte simulations at z = 0. We integrate the orbits using AGAMA (Vasiliev 2019).…”
Section: Appendix C Comparison Of Orbit Integration Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then compute the orbits of the FIRE streams by individually tracing the orbits of each member star through the saved snapshots, and then integrating the orbit around each pericenter using the code AGAMA (Vasiliev 2019). We integrate each star particle in the corresponding host galaxy potential at the snapshot closest to the most recent pericentric passage, 29 using the models from Arora et al (2022). 30 These models are fit to each snapshot, and consist of multipole expansions (up to l = 4), computed using a combination of spherical harmonics and azimuthal harmonics for the halo and disk, respectively.…”
Section: Stellar Streams In Firementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This yields the mean normalized orbital energy 〈E − E 200 〉. Furthermore, the potential (Φ), taken from Arora et al (2022), is comprised of three components: an NFW profile for the dark matter halo (Navarro et al 1996), a spherical potential model for the central bulge, and a Miyamoto-Nagai profile modeling the cylindrical disk of the simulation (Miyamoto & Nagai 1975). This potential is then propagated in simulation time as a time-evolving multipole potential, modeled using a low-order multipole expansion assuming axisymmetry, evaluated at each snapshot independently.…”
Section: Orbital Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values were computed using the potentials determined inArora et al (2022), utilizing the AGAMA Vasiliev (2019) galactic dynamics package.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%