2014
DOI: 10.1155/2014/738350
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Starlikeness of Certain Class of Multivalent Analytic Functions

Abstract: since the continuous linear operators L 1 ( ) and L 2 ( ) acting on R ( , , ; ) do not exist in sharp upper bounds. Putting = = 1 in the first part of Theorem 1, we can get the following result.Abstract and Applied Analysis 5 Corollary 7. Let ≧ 1. Then R( , ) ⊂ S * for 3 ≦ < 1, where 3 is the solution of the following equation:

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. 2 Remark 3.2 If α = β = 1 in Theorem 3.1, we obtain a result found in [10,Lemma 5].…”
Section: Bounds For Auxiliary Linear Operators Acting On B P (α β λ; J)supporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This completes the proof of Theorem 3.1. 2 Remark 3.2 If α = β = 1 in Theorem 3.1, we obtain a result found in [10,Lemma 5].…”
Section: Bounds For Auxiliary Linear Operators Acting On B P (α β λ; J)supporting
confidence: 73%
“…This result was obtained by many authors, see [10,12]. By the aid of the Alexander's relation (f (z) ∈ CV ⇐⇒ zf ′ (z) ∈ S * ) , we have the following consequence result from Theorem 5.5 and Lemma 1.1.…”
Section: Criteria For P-valent Starlike Functions In B P (α β λ; J)supporting
confidence: 54%