Reaction Mechanisms and Control Properties of Phosphotransferases 1973
DOI: 10.1515/9783112575024-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the state of aromatic amino acids in inorganic pyrophosphatase from bakers' yeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This need arises because the true substrate for PPase is a Mg2+ complex of P207'h We should point out that since the microscopic steps for PP¡ hydrolysis and the release of each of the P¡'s are all partially rate determining (Springs et al, 1981), proton donation from R,OH to the phosphoryl group in site 1 need not be simultaneous with water attack on the phosphoryl group in site 2. On the basis of the available evidence from chemical modification studies (Heitmann et al, 1972;Chiu, 1974;Heitmann & Uhlig, 1974) which exclude essential lysine, cysteine, or histidine residues, a tyrosine residue or a bound water molecule is the most likely candidate for RjOH and several tyrosine residues (numbers 88, 92, and 191 in the sequence) have been placed at or near the active site by Kuranova et al (1983). Complexation of R,OH to either or both of the metal ions bound to P¡ in site 1, indicated as a possibility in Figure 7, could lower the pKa of R^H to 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This need arises because the true substrate for PPase is a Mg2+ complex of P207'h We should point out that since the microscopic steps for PP¡ hydrolysis and the release of each of the P¡'s are all partially rate determining (Springs et al, 1981), proton donation from R,OH to the phosphoryl group in site 1 need not be simultaneous with water attack on the phosphoryl group in site 2. On the basis of the available evidence from chemical modification studies (Heitmann et al, 1972;Chiu, 1974;Heitmann & Uhlig, 1974) which exclude essential lysine, cysteine, or histidine residues, a tyrosine residue or a bound water molecule is the most likely candidate for RjOH and several tyrosine residues (numbers 88, 92, and 191 in the sequence) have been placed at or near the active site by Kuranova et al (1983). Complexation of R,OH to either or both of the metal ions bound to P¡ in site 1, indicated as a possibility in Figure 7, could lower the pKa of R^H to 8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary sequence has been determined (Cohen et al, 1978) and an X-ray crystallographic determination of its structure is well underway (Bunick et al, 1978). In addition, important information has been obtained on the binding of divalent metal ions and of pyrophosphate and pyrophosphate analogues port et al, 1973;Baykov & Avaeva, 1974), on the identity of essential amino acids at the active site (Heitmann et al, 1972;Cooperman & Chiu, 1973b;Rapoport et al, 1973;Heitmann & Uhlig, 1974), and on the kinetic (Moe & Butler, 1972a,b;Rapoport et al, 1972) and chemical (Cooperman et al, 1973b;Sperow et al, 1973; Konsowitz & Cooperman, 1976;Avaeva et al, 1977) mechanisms of action.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%