1992
DOI: 10.1016/0961-9526(92)90039-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the static aeroelastic tailoring of composite aircraft swept wings modelled as thin-walled beam structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though not described in Ref. 7, the results suggest that the authors used the first method of disregarding transverse shear effects. As one can see from Fig.…”
Section: Static Aeroelastic Tailoringmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though not described in Ref. 7, the results suggest that the authors used the first method of disregarding transverse shear effects. As one can see from Fig.…”
Section: Static Aeroelastic Tailoringmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…7 continues the work of the first author where the effects of restrained warping, transverse shear effects, and sweep angle are studied in the presence of a more sophisticated structural model. This work uses a thin-walled beam model based on the following premises: i) cross sections do not deform in their own planes; ii) transverse shear measures are included; iii) the warping restraint effect is taken into account through the non-uniform torsion (constrained torsion); iv) the primary warping is associated with uniformtorsion only; and v) the secondary warping is based on the work of Ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model does not take into account the effects of restrained warping and transverse shear. [30] found this leads to either a conservative estimate of the resulting divergence speed, or the difference was less than 2% for slender structures such as the wingbox considered here.…”
Section: Structural Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of particular interest if aerodynamic considerations beyond that required for the aeroelastic analysis are to be taken into account. However, strip theory allows computationally cheap optimization to be undertaken, especially where the focus of the work is on composite tailoring for the aeroelastic response and preliminary design [15,5,29,30]. The lift is then given by:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other refined beam models can be found in the excellent reviews by Kapania and Raciti [32][33], which focused on: bending, vibration, wave propagations, buckling and post-buckling. Excellent papers on structural dynamic and aeroelastic problems of thin-walled structures by means of higher-order beams are those by Librescu [34][35][36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%