We present some properties of hyperkahler torsion (or heterotic) geometry in four dimensions that make it even more tractable than its hyperkahler counterpart. We show that in d = 4 hypercomplex structures and weak torsion hyperkahler geometries are the same. We present two equivalent formalisms describing such spaces, they are stated in the propositions of section 1. The first is reduced to solve a non-linear system for a doublet of potential functions, first found by Plebanski and Finley. The second is equivalent to finding the solutions of a quadratic Ashtekar-Jacobson-Smolin like system, but without a volume preserving condition. This is why heterotic spaces are simpler than usual hyperkahler ones. We also analyze the strong version of this geometry. Certain examples are presented, some of them are metrics of the Callan-Harvey-Strominger type and others are not. In the conclusion we discuss the benefits and disadvantages of both formulations in detail. * Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR, 141 980 Dubna, Moscow Reg., Russia; isae-vap@thsun1.jinr.ru, firenzecita@hotmail.com and osvaldo@thsun1.jinr.ru J 3 = −e 1 ⊗ e 4 + e 4 ⊗ e 1 − e 2 ⊗ e 3 + e 3 ⊗ e 2 , and the action of (2.20) over the tangent space T M x is defined by J 1 (e 1 ) = e 2 , J 1 (e 2 ) = −e 1 , J 1 (e 3 ) = e 4 , J 1 (e 4 ) = −e 3 , J 2 (e 1 ) = e 3 , J 2 (e 2 ) = −e 4 , J 2 (e 3 ) = −e 1 , J 2 (e 4 ) = e 2 , J 3 (e 1 ) = e 4 , J 3 (e 2 ) = e 3 , J 3 (e 3 ) = −e 2 , J 3 (e 4 ) = −e 1 .(2.19)The hyperkahler triplet (2.13) is given by J 1 = e 2 ∧ e 1 + e 4 ∧ e 3 J 2 = e 3 ∧ e 1 + e 2 ∧ e 4 (2.20)