1960
DOI: 10.1088/0370-1328/76/4/305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Stripping of Two Nucleons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that Pellegrini 22 has shown that within the Butler formalism 23 the plane-wave theoretical descriptions of the knockout and deuteron pickup process are almost identical. Furthermore, if the finite size of the incident and exit particles are neglected, then both the knockout 24 and two-nucleon pickup models 18 predict cross sections which are proportional to a sum of spherical Bessel functions. The arguments of the Bessel functions are slightly different in the two cases, but can be made the same by using a slightly larger interaction radius for the knockout case.…”
Section: A Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that Pellegrini 22 has shown that within the Butler formalism 23 the plane-wave theoretical descriptions of the knockout and deuteron pickup process are almost identical. Furthermore, if the finite size of the incident and exit particles are neglected, then both the knockout 24 and two-nucleon pickup models 18 predict cross sections which are proportional to a sum of spherical Bessel functions. The arguments of the Bessel functions are slightly different in the two cases, but can be made the same by using a slightly larger interaction radius for the knockout case.…”
Section: A Generalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The solid line was required to pass through the origin and was least-squares fitted to all the points represented by the solid circles. e.g., Newns' description of two-nucleon pickup, 18 yield expressions for the cross section involving a (27+1) factor. In view of the complexity of these latter expressions, it can be reasonably argued that the simple (27+1) dependence of the DI mechanism could be obscured by fluctuations arising from the complex dependence of the other factors on energy and angular momentum.…”
Section: The (27+1) Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of the 1.25-MeV gamma ray is in agreement with the observations of the 7.34 • -> 6.09 transition reported by Lacambra et al 2 and by Carlson. 5 In order to obtain the relative intensities of the 0.62-, 1.25-, and 7.34-MeV gamma rays, the 7.34-MeV fullenergy-loss peak was corrected for contributions due to chance coincidences and due to the simultaneous entry into the crystal of the 0.62-and 6.72-MeV gamma rays and the 1.25-and 6.09-MeV gamma rays. Chance co- incidences were determined by making use of the realto-random ratio and by fitting the direct gamma-ray spectrum to points beyond the 7.34-MeV full-energyloss peak.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5 Multipolarity measurements have been made on the ground-state transitions from the 6.72-and 7.34-MeV states and Doppler-shift data are presented on various transitions from all of the states studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand the two-nucleon stripping mechanisms considered by EL-NADI [6], NEWl~S [7] and GLE~DE~I~ING [8] seem to gire reliable fitting with the experimental data, when the projectile energy is above the Coulomb barrier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%