2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2006.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the strong non-rigidity of certain tight Euclidean designs

Abstract: We study the non-rigidity of Euclidean t-designs, namely we study when Euclidean designs (in particular certain tight Euclidean designs) can be deformed keeping the property of being Euclidean t-designs. We show that certain tight Euclidean t-designs are non-rigid, and in fact satisfy a stronger form of non-rigidity which we call strong nonrigidity. This shows that there are plenty of non-isomorphic tight Euclidean t-designs for certain parameters, which seems to have been unnoticed before. We also include the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The antipodal Euclidean tight 3-and 5-designs in Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 are non-rigid, because we obtain a distinct antipodal Euclidean tight 3-or 5-designs by changing one of the radii r i of the spheres which support the given antipodal Euclidean tight 3-or 5-design and the corresponding weight w(x), x ∈ X i . By a recent result on non-rigid Euclidean designs obtained by Eiichi Bannai and Djoko Suprijanto [4], it seems that if a Euclidean tight 2e-design or an antipodal Euclidean tight (2e + 1)-design which is supported by more than [ e+ε S 2 ] + 1 spheres exists, then there may possibly exist infinitely many Euclidean tight 2e-designs or antipodal Euclidean tight (2e + 1)-designs respectively. Actually they showed some of the tight Euclidean designs are strongly non-rigid.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The antipodal Euclidean tight 3-and 5-designs in Theorems 1.5 and 1.6 are non-rigid, because we obtain a distinct antipodal Euclidean tight 3-or 5-designs by changing one of the radii r i of the spheres which support the given antipodal Euclidean tight 3-or 5-design and the corresponding weight w(x), x ∈ X i . By a recent result on non-rigid Euclidean designs obtained by Eiichi Bannai and Djoko Suprijanto [4], it seems that if a Euclidean tight 2e-design or an antipodal Euclidean tight (2e + 1)-design which is supported by more than [ e+ε S 2 ] + 1 spheres exists, then there may possibly exist infinitely many Euclidean tight 2e-designs or antipodal Euclidean tight (2e + 1)-designs respectively. Actually they showed some of the tight Euclidean designs are strongly non-rigid.…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Step 2: If there exist 3-class symmetric association schemes on N 1 and N 2 points simultaneously, then further check if X i carries a Q-polynomial scheme (by Corollary 2.4). If such a polynomial scheme exists, then -Calculate the weight function w by equation (7)  and 3  .…”
Section: Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, they also completely classified tight Euclidean 4designs with constant weight in n  , for 2 n  , supported by two concentric spheres. Recently, in a joint work with Bannai and Bannai [7], the author introduced a new concept of strong non-rigidity for Euclidean t-designs. By using this new concept we also disproved Delsarte-Neumaier-Seidel's conjecture by showing the existence of infinitely many tight Euclidean designs having certain parameters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the detailed definition and the basic properties of Euclidean designs and examples of Euclidean designs please refer [28,20,1,2,5,6,7,9,10,15,16,26,27,31], etc. Here we only give the fact we need directly to prove our main theorems.…”
Section: Some Basic Facts On Euclidean T-designsmentioning
confidence: 99%