2010
DOI: 10.1017/s0001867800050473
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the structure and representations of max-stable processes

Abstract: We develop classification results for max-stable processes, based on their spectral representations. The structure of max-linear isometries and minimal spectral representations play important roles. We propose a general classification strategy for measurable maxstable processes based on the notion of co-spectral functions. In particular, we discuss the spectrally continuous-discrete, the conservative-dissipative, and the positive-null decompositions. For stationary max-stable processes, the latter two decompos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(59 reference statements)
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extension to the multiparameter case where T ≠ m is a simple generalization using theorem 6.1.2 in Krengel (), which is a multiparameter extension of the Ackoglus ergodic theorem. Ergodic properties of Brown–Resnick processes have been studied for the uniparameter case in Stoev and Taqqu () and Wang and Stoev (). The Brown–Resnick process (2) has a stochastic representation 2.047em2.047emtrue{Eeexpfalse{W(s,t)italicδ(s,t)false}dM1,sRd,tfalse[0,false)2.047em2.047emtrue}, where M1 is a random 1‐Fréchet sup‐measure on the probability space (Ω,E,P) on which the Gaussian process W is defined.…”
Section: Strong Consistency Of the Pairwise Likelihood Estimates For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extension to the multiparameter case where T ≠ m is a simple generalization using theorem 6.1.2 in Krengel (), which is a multiparameter extension of the Ackoglus ergodic theorem. Ergodic properties of Brown–Resnick processes have been studied for the uniparameter case in Stoev and Taqqu () and Wang and Stoev (). The Brown–Resnick process (2) has a stochastic representation 2.047em2.047emtrue{Eeexpfalse{W(s,t)italicδ(s,t)false}dM1,sRd,tfalse[0,false)2.047em2.047emtrue}, where M1 is a random 1‐Fréchet sup‐measure on the probability space (Ω,E,P) on which the Gaussian process W is defined.…”
Section: Strong Consistency Of the Pairwise Likelihood Estimates For mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model simplifies for β = α to the power model of a fractional Brownian random field (Mandelbrot and Van Ness, ), for 0< β ⩽ α to a generalization of the fractional Brownian model described in the work of Schlather (), and for β <0 to the generalized Cauchy model (Gneiting, ; Gneiting and Schlather, ). It also generalizes some of the multiquadric and inverse multiquadric models used in approximation theory where α =2 and β/αdouble-struckRdouble-struckN0, see, for instance, Buhmann (), Wendland () or Lin and Yuan (). As β0, the limiting model equals a modified version of the De Wijsian model (Wackernagel, ; Matheron, ).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…For Gaussian process models, spatial prediction is accomplished through the classical geostatistical technique Kriging. Under previous max‐stable process models, spatial prediction is possible but complicated (e.g., Wang and Stoev, ). The HKEVP, in contrast, permits straightforward spatial prediction at unobserved sites.…”
Section: A Spatial Max‐stable Process Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%