2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2105.12534
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the structure of computable reducibility on equivalence relations of natural numbers

Uri Andrews,
Daniel Belin,
Luca San Mauro

Abstract: We examine the degree structure ER of equivalence relations on ω under computable reducibility. We examine when pairs of degrees have a join. In particular, we show that sufficiently incomparable pairs of degrees do not have a join but that some incomparable degrees do, and we characterize the degrees which have a join with every finite equivalence relation. We show that the natural classes of finite, light, and dark degrees are definable in ER. We show that every equivalence relation has continuum many self-f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We prove now that the distributive lattice of punctual degrees is dense. This contrasts with the case of Ceers and ER, where each degree has a minimal cover (see [6,3] for details). However, density is a phenomenon that often shows up when focusing on the subrecursive world.…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We prove now that the distributive lattice of punctual degrees is dense. This contrasts with the case of Ceers and ER, where each degree has a minimal cover (see [6,3] for details). However, density is a phenomenon that often shows up when focusing on the subrecursive world.…”
Section: Densitymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Less is known about larger structures of c-degrees; but recent studies considered the ∆ 0 2 case [30,9] and the global structure ER of all c-degrees [3]. Yet, despite its classificatory power, computable reducibility has an obvious shortcoming: it is simply too coarse for measuring the relative complexity of computable equivalence relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%