“…Now [21,Corollary 6.34] (which generalizes earlier work of Kuznetsov [3], Weisfeiler [24], and Skryabin [11]) says that L is one of sl (2), W (1; n), H (2; n; Φ) (2) for some n and Φ. As TR(L) = 3 we have L sl (2).…”
Section: Case (A): Lie Algebras Without Nonsolvable 1-sectionsmentioning
Let L be a finite-dimensional simple Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic p > 3 and T a torus of maximal dimension in the p-envelope of L in Der L. In this paper we describe the T -semisimple quotients of the 2-sections of L relative to T and prove that if all 1-sections of L relative to T are compositionally classical or solvable then L is either classical or a Block algebra or a filtered Lie algebra of type S.
“…Now [21,Corollary 6.34] (which generalizes earlier work of Kuznetsov [3], Weisfeiler [24], and Skryabin [11]) says that L is one of sl (2), W (1; n), H (2; n; Φ) (2) for some n and Φ. As TR(L) = 3 we have L sl (2).…”
Section: Case (A): Lie Algebras Without Nonsolvable 1-sectionsmentioning
Let L be a finite-dimensional simple Lie algebra over an algebraically closed field F of characteristic p > 3 and T a torus of maximal dimension in the p-envelope of L in Der L. In this paper we describe the T -semisimple quotients of the 2-sections of L relative to T and prove that if all 1-sections of L relative to T are compositionally classical or solvable then L is either classical or a Block algebra or a filtered Lie algebra of type S.
“…To show that j = 1, we will, for a contradiction, assume that j = 2. We begin by using an inductive argument from [13,Lemma 2.14] to show that the centralizer of S s in L <0 is zero. Denote by Z the centralizer of S s in L. Then Z = ⊕Z i is a homogeneous subspace of L. Since S s is stable under ad L ≧0 , Z is, as well.…”
Section: Conclusion Of the Proof Of The Main Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See Corollary 1.7.) But then we would have [L 0 , S s ] = [[S 2 , Z −2 ], S s ] = [S 2 , [Z −2 , S s ]] = 0, to contradict[13, Lemma 2.13]. (See also Lemma 2.28.)…”
We consider finite-dimensional irreducible transitive graded Lie algebras L = r i=−q Li over algebraically closed fields of characteristic three. We assume that the null component L0 is classical and reductive. The adjoint representation of L on itself induces a representation of the commutator subalgebra L ′ 0 of the null component on the minus-one component L−1. We show that if the depth q of L is greater than one, then this representation must be restricted.
“…3] for producing quotients of subalgebras in a graded Lie algebra g = r i=−q g i . It has been applied subsequently in several other settings; for example, it was used by Skryabin in [Sk2] to derive information about the solvable radical of g 0 .…”
Chapter 3. The Contragredient Case 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Results on modules for three-dimensional Lie algebras 3.3. Primitive vectors in g 1 and g −1 3.4. Subalgebras with a balanced grading 3.5. Algebras with an unbalanced grading Chapter 4. The Noncontragredient Case 4.1. General assumptions and notation 4.2. Brackets of weight vectors in opposite gradation spaces 4.3. Determining g 0 and its representation on g −1 4.4. Additional assumptions 4.5. Computing weights of b − -primitive vectors in g 1 4.6. Determination of the local Lie algebra 4.7. The irreducibility of g 1 4.8. Determining the negative part when g 1 is irreducible 4.9. Determining the negative part when g 1 is reducible 4.10. The case that g 0 is abelian 4.11. Completion of the proof of the Main Theorem Bibliography
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.