2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.11883
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the sum of a prime and a square-free number with divisibility conditions

Abstract: Every integer greater than two can be expressed as the sum of a prime and a square-free number. Expanding on recent work, we provide explicit and asymptotic results when divisibility conditions are imposed on the square-free number. For example, we show for odd k ≤ 10 5 and even k ≤ 2 • 10 5 that any even integer n ≥ 40 can be expressed as the sum of a prime and a squarefree number coprime to k. We also discuss applications to other Goldbach-like problems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be possible to exactly compute k, but we will not do so here. We also note that Theorem 50 was improved by Lee and Francis in [24], and Hathi and Johnston in [27]. However, such improvements have a negligible impact on Theorem 5 unless Theorem 3 is substantially improved.…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 4 and Theoremmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…It should be possible to exactly compute k, but we will not do so here. We also note that Theorem 50 was improved by Lee and Francis in [24], and Hathi and Johnston in [27]. However, such improvements have a negligible impact on Theorem 5 unless Theorem 3 is substantially improved.…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 4 and Theoremmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This is essentially identical to that of [HJ21, Lemma 5.1] with two main differences. First, we have introduced a parameter B which replaces the choice of √ 10 5 used in [HJ21]. Secondly, we have replaced "c θ (da 2 /e)/ log n" with c θ (X3) log 2 (N )…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that there is also a slight notation clash with [HJ21, Lemma 5.1]. Namely, N and c θ mean something different in [HJ21] and we have accounted for this accordingly.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%