2011
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnr202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Sup-Norm of Maass Cusp Forms of Large Level: II

Abstract: Abstract. Let f be a Hecke-Maass cuspidal newform of square-free level N and Laplacian eigenvalue λ. It is shown that f ∞ λ, N −1/12+ f 2 for any > 0, with an implied constant depending continuously on λ. The proof is short and selfcontained.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We consider an amplified second moment which we transform by a pre-trace formula into a sum over a sort of automorphic kernel, see (5.3). This starting point is similar in most investigations of sup-norms of eigenfunction on arithmetically defined manifolds, see, for example, [2,9,11,16,21]. In all cases one encounters eventually an interesting diophantine problem the solution of which is at the heart of the problem.…”
Section: Principle Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We consider an amplified second moment which we transform by a pre-trace formula into a sum over a sort of automorphic kernel, see (5.3). This starting point is similar in most investigations of sup-norms of eigenfunction on arithmetically defined manifolds, see, for example, [2,9,11,16,21]. In all cases one encounters eventually an interesting diophantine problem the solution of which is at the heart of the problem.…”
Section: Principle Of Proofmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…We also obtain a bound for newforms that generalizes and strengthens previously known results; see Theorem 3. 7 Finally, we remark that the results of this paper appear to be the first time that the local bound in the conductor aspect has been improved upon for squarefull conductors, for any kind of automorphic form on a compact domain. (In the noncompact case, this had been achieved in our previous paper [11].)…”
Section: A Classical Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Hence (6) allows us to define a character on Γ O which (by abusing notation) we also denote by χ. Let N χ be an integer such that (7) O…”
Section: A Classical Reformulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The corresponding forms f are (Hecke-Maass or holomorphic) newforms with respect to the group Γ 1 (C). For such newforms and for squarefree C there were several results [5,10,11,39,41] culiminating in the bound φ ∞ ≪ k/λ,ǫ C 1/3+ǫ due to Harcos and Templier. (Here, for simplicity, we have quoted the bound only in the conductor-aspect, noting that a hybrid result was proved by Templier in [41].) This bound was generalized to the case of powerful (non-squarefree) C by the third author [35].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%