1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf00044967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the super-Rayleigh/subseismic elastodynamic indentation problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As noted above sliding contact solutions for speeds v R < v < v S violate Signorini conditions [Georgiadis and Barber 1993]. In particular, in the sliding die problem here (28a) for normal stress in C still holds for this speed range, and is still both bounded and continuous on zone boundary .…”
Section: Comment On Supercritical/subseismic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As noted above sliding contact solutions for speeds v R < v < v S violate Signorini conditions [Georgiadis and Barber 1993]. In particular, in the sliding die problem here (28a) for normal stress in C still holds for this speed range, and is still both bounded and continuous on zone boundary .…”
Section: Comment On Supercritical/subseismic Behaviormentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The negative gives σ an integrable singularity as x → x + . Signorini conditions for contact [Georgiadis and Barber 1993] prohibit singular gradients at the contact zone boundary. Therefore (27) leads to…”
Section: Louis Milton Brockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, Craggs and Roberts [1] studied the elastodynamic problem of a moving indentor and obtained physically acceptable solutions for sub-Rayleigh and supersonic sliding speeds. Subsequent work by Georgiadis and Barber [2] yielded an additional physically acceptable result for a particular speed in the transonic range and also discussed a paradox occurring in the super-Rayleigh / subseismic regime. Other efforts by Brock [3,4] dealt with the 2D sliding indentation of thermoelastic half-spaces in the presence of Coulomb friction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, it is assumed that the surface of the elastic body outside the contact region is free from tractions and thermally insulated. Our analysis is restricted to the subRayleigh regime, so as to avoid non-uniqueness of the solution or violation of the condition of non-tensile normal stress along the contact area [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The more basic models are generally quasistatic, assume Hertzian contact, and are isothermal. However, more recent studies consider, variously, thermoelastic contact and inertial effects [Hills and Barber 1986;Georgiadis and Barber 1993;Pauk and Yevtushenko 1997;Barber 1999;Jang 2000;Pauk and Zastrau 2002;Andersson et al 2005;Jang 2005]. In addition, studies of the mathematically-similar problem of the interface crack [Hills and Barber 1993; address issues that also arise in contact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%