2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the surface-dependent oxidation of Cu2O during CO oxidation: Cu2+ is more active than Cu+

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 However, most of the discussed previous reports have focused on using Cu or Cu-oxide nanoparticles without much emphasis on the atomic doping effect or single atoms. 6,9 Ubiquitously, the exposed atoms on the surface of Cu nanoparticles serve as active catalytic sites; meanwhile, the inner atoms are spectators, which devalue the catalytic activity. Likewise, the ease of oxidation feasibility of Cu nanoparticles [i.e., Cu(0) to Cu (I) or Cu(II)] in oxygen-rich atmospheres remains a daunting challenge that precluding commercial utilization of Cu-based catalysts for CO Ox .…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 However, most of the discussed previous reports have focused on using Cu or Cu-oxide nanoparticles without much emphasis on the atomic doping effect or single atoms. 6,9 Ubiquitously, the exposed atoms on the surface of Cu nanoparticles serve as active catalytic sites; meanwhile, the inner atoms are spectators, which devalue the catalytic activity. Likewise, the ease of oxidation feasibility of Cu nanoparticles [i.e., Cu(0) to Cu (I) or Cu(II)] in oxygen-rich atmospheres remains a daunting challenge that precluding commercial utilization of Cu-based catalysts for CO Ox .…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, in metal oxides, Cu + had better CO catalytic activity than Cu 2+ , and the activity of the catalysts was evaluated by the fraction of Cu + (Cu + /(Cu + + Cu 2+ )). The larger the fraction of Cu + , the better the catalytic effect was . The ratio of Cu + was calculated from the ratio of the area of the Cu + peak to the main Cu 2p 3/2 peak, the fractions of Cu + (Cu + /(Cu + + Cu 2+ )) in the three catalysts were 0.54, 0.49, and 0.49, respectively, indicating that N-doped CuO/Cu had a better CO catalytic effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The larger the fraction of Cu + , the better the catalytic effect was. 53 The ratio of Cu + was calculated from the ratio of the area of the Cu + peak to the main Cu 2p 3/2 peak, the fractions of Cu + (Cu + /(Cu + + Cu 2+ )) in the three catalysts were 0.54, 0.49, and 0.49, respectively, indicating that N-doped CuO/Cu had a better CO catalytic effect. Oxygen properties were analyzed in detail through the O 1s spectra.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The commonly used catalysts for CO oxidation are divided into noble metal catalysts such as Pt, 7,8 Au, 9–12 Pd, 13 Ag, 14 Ru, 15 Rh, 16 and Ir (ref. 17) and transition metal catalysts such as Cu, 18–21 Co, 22–25 and Mn. 26,27 In the reaction atmosphere (CO and O 2 ), the noble metal catalysts commonly show a higher CO catalytic activity than transition metal catalysts, whereas the drawback of high cost is a major limit for their wide applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%