On The Surface Energy Of Elemental Metals Using The Stabilized Jellium Model

Osiele, OM; Olubosded, O

doi:10.4314/njphy.v19i1.38119

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Results2

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2011

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Input values and the results of calculations for the MPM model. SJM, Ab-initio and Experimental values are taken from references Osiele, O.M. and Olubosede, O.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Comparison of Calculated Work Function of Metals Using Metallic Plasma Model with Stabilized Jellium, Ab-Initio Approach and Experimental Values

Olubosede¹,

Afolabi²,

Fayose³

et al. 2011

APR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The work function of metals was calculated using the metallic plasma model (MPM). The results obtained were compared with the available results of the stabilized jellium model (SJM), Ab-initio model and the experimental values. Result shows that the stabilized jellium model was in good agreement with experimental values for the simple metals, the transition, inner transition and rare-earth metals. The metallic plasma model gave results that are agreeable with experimental values for most of the metals especially the polycrystalline metals. The ab-initio results were higher than experimental values except for Ba, Ca and Sr, this shows that the metallic plasma model is more reliable in predicting the work function of metals.

show abstract

“…Input values and the results of calculations for the MPM model. SJM, Ab-initio and Experimental values are taken from references Osiele, O.M. and Olubosede, O.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…P. 345-368. and Michaelson H.B, (1977 Ref. (Osiele,O.M., et al 2007) Ab-initio method (eV) Ref. (Ashcroft N.W et al 1976) Experimental Value (eV) Ref.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%