2018 IEEE 24th International Symposium on on-Line Testing and Robust System Design (IOLTS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iolts.2018.8474085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the test of a COTS-based system for space applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, in [7] we proposed an approach, which aims at partly automating the safe faults identification process taking into account all the constraints coming from the application scenario, including the application software to be run by the CPU. Some preliminary results coming from the application of the same method to the OR1200 CPU have been reported in [19]. In this paper, we improve the procedure used in [7] and [19] and extend the work reported in [23] to peripheral modules, not necessarily CPU only.…”
Section: Safe Faults Identificationmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this reason, in [7] we proposed an approach, which aims at partly automating the safe faults identification process taking into account all the constraints coming from the application scenario, including the application software to be run by the CPU. Some preliminary results coming from the application of the same method to the OR1200 CPU have been reported in [19]. In this paper, we improve the procedure used in [7] and [19] and extend the work reported in [23] to peripheral modules, not necessarily CPU only.…”
Section: Safe Faults Identificationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Some preliminary results coming from the application of the same method to the OR1200 CPU have been reported in [19]. In this paper, we improve the procedure used in [7] and [19] and extend the work reported in [23] to peripheral modules, not necessarily CPU only. The improved method is now able to identify a larger number of safe faults, thanks to a mechanism allowing to exploit the power of a commercial ATPG tool.…”
Section: Safe Faults Identificationmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…To perform the same step, in this paper we resort to an ATPG tool, so that a larger number of safe faults can be identified, taking into account the constraints on the input signals of the combinational logic. This allowed us to increase by about 3% the number of safe faults identified by this step with respect to the results presented in [19]. The usage of a commercial tool also makes the applicability of the proposed method easier.…”
Section: B Safe Faults Identificationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…For this reason, in [7] we recently proposed an approach, which aims at partly automating the safe faults identification process taking into account all the constraints coming from the application scenario, including the application software to be run by the CPU. Some preliminary results coming from the application of the same method to the OR1200 CPU have been reported in [19].…”
Section: B Safe Faults Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation