1981
DOI: 10.4064/aa-39-3-265-267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the theorem of Jarník and Besicovitch

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
2

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaufman's set [17], unlike those of Salem and Kahane, is completely deterministic. It is easily seen that if x belongs to Kaufman's set, then so do 2x, 3x, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaufman's set [17], unlike those of Salem and Kahane, is completely deterministic. It is easily seen that if x belongs to Kaufman's set, then so do 2x, 3x, .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite difficult to construct explicit examples of Salem sets with 0 < dim H (E) < 1. Such constructions are due to Salem [25], Kaufman [17], Bluhm [2], [3]; we give an alternative construction in Section 6. On the other hand, Kahane [16] showed that Salem sets are ubiquitous among random sets, in the sense that images of compact sets under Brownian motion are almost surely Salem sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Salem's construction of such sets was probabilistic. Deterministic constructions of Salem sets on the real line are rare; however see [8] and [6]. We follow Salem's probabilistic approach to proving the existence of generalized Cantor type Salem sets in an ultrametric local field K. The existence of the norm | · | and the local compactness property of K allow us to adjust all the above real analysis to the local field setting.…”
Section: Salem Sets In Ultrametric Local Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rather different measure of the size of sets of real numbers arises in harmonic analysis. In [6] Kaufman showed that badly approximable numbers carry a measure in M o and in [7] he has shown that well approximable numbers also carry a measure in M o . This is a subtle distributional property which is not characterized by, for example, merely the Lebesgue measure of E (cf.…”
Section: H *Oomentioning
confidence: 99%