2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2022.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the time lag between solar wind dynamic parameters and solar activity UV proxies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, in all of them it is possible to identify two modes under the year scale, one mode that can be linked to QBOs, one mode with characteristic time scale ∼ 11-year (solar cycle component) and a further one describing longer time scale variations. The presence of clear solar-cycle modulation in v SW and P d,SW is in agreement with previous findings (El-Borie, 2002;Dmitriev, Suvorova, and Veselovsky, 2013;Li, Zhang, and Feng, 2017;Reda, Giovannelli, and Alberti, 2023), confirming the presence of a link between solar activity and solar wind properties at 11-year scale (Venzmer and Bothmer, 2018;Samsonov et al, 2019;Reda et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, in all of them it is possible to identify two modes under the year scale, one mode that can be linked to QBOs, one mode with characteristic time scale ∼ 11-year (solar cycle component) and a further one describing longer time scale variations. The presence of clear solar-cycle modulation in v SW and P d,SW is in agreement with previous findings (El-Borie, 2002;Dmitriev, Suvorova, and Veselovsky, 2013;Li, Zhang, and Feng, 2017;Reda, Giovannelli, and Alberti, 2023), confirming the presence of a link between solar activity and solar wind properties at 11-year scale (Venzmer and Bothmer, 2018;Samsonov et al, 2019;Reda et al, 2023b).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Specifically, the respective time lags for the two states of phase differences are as follows: 4.6 years and 2.4 years for solar wind speed, and 5.0 years and 2.8 years for solar wind dynamic pressure. These results, based on a phase analysis, confirm the previous findings reported by Samsonov et al (2019) and by Reda, Giovannelli, and Alberti (2023) through cross-correlation analysis. Overall, both P d,SW and v SW are always characterized by delayed (negative phase differences) variations with respect to Ca II K index.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A 3.2-year lag of solar wind speed with respect to the Ca II K index is found using both cross-correlation and mutual information analysis, while a 3.6-year lag is found between the magnetic proxy and solar wind dynamic pressure. The analysis on the time lag behaviour between the Ca II K index and the same solar wind parameters was further extended in Reda et al (2023a), studying how their pairwise relative lags vary over the last five solar cycles, with values ranging from 6 years to 1 year.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%