2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-020-01400-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the topology of metric f–K-contact manifolds

Abstract: We observe that the class of metric f -K-contact manifolds, which naturally contains that of K-contact manifolds, is closed under forming mapping tori of automorphisms of the structure. We show that the de Rham cohomology of compact metric f -K-contact manifolds naturally splits off an exterior algebra, and relate the closed leaves of the characteristic foliation to its basic cohomology.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 53C25, 53C15, Secondary 53D10, 32V05.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Is a compact weak f -Kcontact Einstein manifold an S-manifold? When a given weak f -K-contact manifold is a mapping torus (see [18]) of a manifold of lower dimension? When a weak f -contact manifold equipped with a Ricci-type soliton structure, carries a canonical (for example, with constant sectional curvature or Einstein-type) metric?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Is a compact weak f -Kcontact Einstein manifold an S-manifold? When a given weak f -K-contact manifold is a mapping torus (see [18]) of a manifold of lower dimension? When a weak f -contact manifold equipped with a Ricci-type soliton structure, carries a canonical (for example, with constant sectional curvature or Einstein-type) metric?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the next theorem, we characterize weak f -K-contact manifolds among all weak f -contact manifolds by the following well known property of f -K-contact manifolds, see [4,18]:…”
Section: Killing Vector Fields Of Unit Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, S-structures are a natural generalization of Sasakian structures. However, unlike Sasakian manifolds, no S-structure can be realized on a simply connected compact manifold [7] (see also (Corollary 4.3,[8])). In [9], an example of an even dimensional principal toroidal bundle over a Kaehler manifold which does not carry any Sasakian structure is presented and an S-structure on the even dimensional manifold U(2) is constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, S-structures are a natural generalization of Sasakian structures. However, unlike Sasakian manifolds, no S-structure can be realized on a simply connected compact manifold [8] (see also [14,Corollary 4.3]). In [10], an example of an even dimensional principal toroidal bundle over a Kaehler manifold which does not carry any Sasakian structure is presented and an S-structure on the even dimensional manifold U (2) is constructed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%