2013
DOI: 10.1111/bij.12004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the trail of Neolithic mice and men towards Transcaucasia: zooarchaeological clues from Nakhchivan (Azerbaijan)

Abstract: Transcaucasia comprises a key region for understanding the history of both the hybrid zone between house mouse lineages and the dispersal of the Neolithic way of life outside its Near Eastern cradle. The opportunity to document the colonization history of both men and mice in Transcaucasia was made possible by the discovery of mouse remains accumulated in pits from a 6000‐year‐old farming village in the Nakhchivan (Autonomous Republic of Nakhchivan, Azerbaijan). The present study investigated their taxonomy an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The earliest invasive rodent to enter Britain via commensalism with humans was the house mouse, which became associated with humans in western Asia but arrived in Britain by the Iron Age (~1000 BC). Both black and brown rats are believed to have originated in eastern Asia, with the former originating in the Indo‐Malayan region and the latter further north on the plains of northern China and Mongolia .…”
Section: Microfaunal Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest invasive rodent to enter Britain via commensalism with humans was the house mouse, which became associated with humans in western Asia but arrived in Britain by the Iron Age (~1000 BC). Both black and brown rats are believed to have originated in eastern Asia, with the former originating in the Indo‐Malayan region and the latter further north on the plains of northern China and Mongolia .…”
Section: Microfaunal Remainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cucchi et al 2013;Pearch et al 2013;Weissbrod et al 2017). As such, they have traditionally formed the primary taxonomic criterion for rodent systematics (Musser 1972(Musser , 1981(Musser , 1986Musser and Newcomb 1983) and identification of specimens from fossil and sub-fossil deposits is often based on dental remains Pearch et al 2013;Weissbrod et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods, based on landmarks or outline analyses, have been used to tackle many topics regarding rodent evolution: evolutionary patterns along fossil lineages (Renaud et al 1996Piras et al 2009;Stoetzel et al 2013), diversification among species, addressing the respective role of adaptation and neutral evolution (e.g. Cardini 2003;Monteiro et al 2005;Macholan 2006;Michaux et al 2007a); differentiation between populations, investigating the role of environmental variations (Renaud 1999;Fadda and Corti 2001;Michaux 2003, 2007;McGuire 2010;Helvaci et al 2012), processes favoring co--occurrence among species , patterns and route of colonization (Valenzuela--Lamas et al 2011;Siahsarvie et al 2012;Cucchi et al 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%