“…Quantitative comparison of the damping capacity of materials is difficult, because of the differences in testing method (torsion pendulum methods [5,21,24,27,30,39,42,52,53,67], suspended beam method [4,14,16,18,29], dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer technique [12,15,17,19,22,25,31], Piezoelectric ultrasonic composite oscillator technique), exciting mode (impulse excitation [4,16,18], forced vibration [24,27,30,67], free decay [5,23,39], resonant vibration [30]), testing parameters (temperature, the loading frequency, strain amplitude) [70,71], and specimen configuration (wire, rod, sheet). On the other hand, measures of damping capacity include loss angle (φ), loss tangent (tan φ), inverse quality factor (Q -1 ), loss factor (η), logarithmic decrement (δ) and specific damping capacity (SDC, ψ).…”