1975
DOI: 10.1002/nav.3800220402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the treatment of force‐level constraints in times‐equential combat problems

Abstract: The treatment of force-level constraints in time-sequential combat optimization problems is illustrated by further studying the fire-programming problem of Isbell and Marlow. By using the theory of state variable inequality constraints from modern optimal control theory, sharper results are obtained on necessary conditions of optimality for an optimal fire-distribution policy (in several cases justifying conjectures made in previous analysis). This leads to simplification of the determination of the domains of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, such battle-outcome information .could only be readily obtained from constant-coefficient models, and S. Bonder [3,18,19] has emphasized the deficiencies of constant-coefficient models (see Section 3 below). These results are not only significant in their own right but are also useful in the quantitative analysis of time-sequential combat strategies (see, for example, [20,21]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, such battle-outcome information .could only be readily obtained from constant-coefficient models, and S. Bonder [3,18,19] has emphasized the deficiencies of constant-coefficient models (see Section 3 below). These results are not only significant in their own right but are also useful in the quantitative analysis of time-sequential combat strategies (see, for example, [20,21]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…L(0, +a) or b(t) E L(0, + 4. Then the X force will be annihilated in finite time if and only $ where the panty-condition parameter Q* is unique and given by (21) means that neither force is annihilated (in other words, the forces are of "equal fighting strength) if and only if which when to = 0, simplifies to In other words, the above equation (23) is a condition under which two forces are "at parity" with one another (hence, the term parity-condition parameter). Observing the special case (24), we may consider the parity-condition parameter to be "the enemy force equivalent of a friendly of unit strength" (see also equation (17) of [7]).…”
Section: Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only systematic examinations of the irduences of the nature of the criterion function on the structure of optimal time-sequential firedistribution strategies known to the authors are those of Taylor [30][31][32][33]35,37,40,43]. In [31] and [40], however, the influences of the nature of the targettype attrition process on the structure of optimal firedistribution policies were examined.…”
Section: Previous Work On the Structure Of Optimal Fire-distribution mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than explicitly constructing extremals and determining domains of controllability [30,35,401, it is more convenient to show that the return (i.e. value of the criterion functional) corresponding to certain extremals dominates that from others.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Extremalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation