2016
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the treatments of heterogeneities and periodic boundary conditions for isogeometric homogenization analysis

Abstract: Summary The treatments of heterogeneities and periodic boundary conditions are explored to properly perform isogeometric analysis (IGA) based on NURBS basis functions in solving homogenization problems for heterogeneous media with omni‐directional periodicity and composite plates with in‐plane periodicity. Because the treatment of the combination of different materials in IGA models is not trivial especially for periodicity constraints, the first priority is to clearly specify points at issue in the numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, IGA is of advantage in dealing with frictional contact problems as demonstrated in Lu (2011De Lorenzis et al (2011), Temizer et al (2012; Nishi et al (2019a). Also, it is applied in other interesting areas such as damage/fracture (Verhoosel et al (2011), Borden (2012; , electromagnetics (Buffa et al, 2010), heat transfer (An et al (2018), , multiscale (Matsubara et al (2016) and structural optimization (Seo et al (2010); Dedè et al (2012); Nishi et al (2019b) problems. Nonetheless, IGA has never joined hands with the microplane damage model to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Incorporation Of Gradientenhanced Microplanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, IGA is of advantage in dealing with frictional contact problems as demonstrated in Lu (2011De Lorenzis et al (2011), Temizer et al (2012; Nishi et al (2019a). Also, it is applied in other interesting areas such as damage/fracture (Verhoosel et al (2011), Borden (2012; , electromagnetics (Buffa et al, 2010), heat transfer (An et al (2018), , multiscale (Matsubara et al (2016) and structural optimization (Seo et al (2010); Dedè et al (2012); Nishi et al (2019b) problems. Nonetheless, IGA has never joined hands with the microplane damage model to the best of our knowledge.…”
Section: Incorporation Of Gradientenhanced Microplanementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When using IGA to solve the RVE equilibrium boundary value problem, some extra considerations are necessary. As pointed out in the work of Matsubara et al, the generation of a parallelepiped RVE geometry using NURBS can cause problems due to the fact that the sharp corners need to be represented by smooth basis functions. The authors thus proposed a strategy that involves splitting the domain into different patches and enforcing continuity of the displacement field across patches as an additional constraint on top of the PBCs.…”
Section: Rve Boundary Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the aforementioned features make IGA an attractive choice of numerical tool for use in conjunction with computational homogenization. Indeed, in the work of Matsubara et al, IGA was used to perform NMT, with focus restricted to the infinitesimal deformation case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of these advantages, only few attempts have so far been made at computational homogenization along with the method of IGA to the best of the author's knowledge. The first trial in this context is carried out by Matsubara et al [38], who discuss the points of attention in modeling multiple patches for multiple materials and in treating constraint conditions unique to NMT and NPT. However, it does not necessarily state their belief in the superiority of IGbased computational homogenization over FE-based one.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%