2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1511.08897
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the uniqueness of generic representations in an $L$-packet

Abstract: In this paper, we give a simple and short proof of the uniqueness of generic representations in an L-packet for a quasi-split connected classical group over a non-archimedean local field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A simple proof of the other direction is given by the first author [At2]. Also (3) is a special case of Gross-Prasad conjecture [GGP,Conjecture 17.1], which is proven by Waldspurger [W2], [W3], [W5] and [W6].…”
Section: Local Langlands Correspondence For So(v 2nmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A simple proof of the other direction is given by the first author [At2]. Also (3) is a special case of Gross-Prasad conjecture [GGP,Conjecture 17.1], which is proven by Waldspurger [W2], [W3], [W5] and [W6].…”
Section: Local Langlands Correspondence For So(v 2nmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(2) In [At2], the first author gave a proof of "only if " part of Proposition 3.5 (3). This proof is essentially the same as the proof of Desideratum 3.9 (3) (Theorem 3.13).…”
Section: Local Langlands Correspondence For O(v 2nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of generic representations this factor is trivial (cf. [12], Proposition 3.1 and [2]). Thus, let φ : W D F → Sp(2n, C) be the L-parameter of a generic discrete series π of SO(2n+1, F ).…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%