On the use of parataxonomy in biodiversity monitoring: a case study on wild flora

Abstract

International audienceMonitoring programs that assess species-richness and turnover are now regarded as essential to document biodiversity loss worldwide. Implementation of such programs is impeded by a general decrease in the number of skilled naturalists. Here we studied how morphotypes, instead of species, might be used by unskilled participants (referred to as “volunteers”) to survey common plant communities. Our main questions were: (1) Can morphotypes be used as a robust estimator of species-richness (alpha-diversity) and assemblage turnover (Beta-diversity)? and (2) What is the robustness (reproducibility and repeatability) of such methods? Double inventories were performed on 150 plots in arable Weld margins, one by a non-expert using morphotypes, the other by a taxonomist using species. To test the robustness of morphotype identiWcation among participants, 20 additional plots were surveyed by eight volunteers using the same protocol. We showed that (1) the number of morphotypes identiWed by unskilled volunteers in a plot was always strongly correlated with species-richness. (2) Morphotypes were sensitive to diVerences among habitats but were less accurate than species to detect these diVerences. (3) Morphotype identiWcation varied signiWcantly within and between volunteers. Due to this lack of repeatability and reproducibility, parataxonomy cannot be considered a good surrogate for taxonomy. Nevertheless, assuming that morphotypes are identiWed with standardized methods, and that results are used only to evaluate gross species-richness but not species turnover, parataxonomy might be a valuable tool for rapid biodiversity assessment of common wild flora

Does urbanization explain differences in interactions between an insect herbivore and its natural enemies and mutualists?

“…In addition to these habitat variables, plant species richness within a 30-m radius of the study sites was estimated during the experimental period by visually counting all plant morphospecies within the area surrounding each experimental colony. This method is strongly correlated with species richness and it effectively captures variance between study areas, with the advantage of reduced sampling effort and increased effectiveness to achieve statistical power (Abadie et al 2008;Schmiedel et al 2016). Distance to the urban center (m) was calculated from each study site to a point at the central area of the town (Fig.…”

The Roles of Taxonomy and Systematics in Bat Conservation

“…To counter the lack of taxonomic experts during surveys, a technique called parataxonomic sorting was introduced in the late 1980s for entomological surveys in the Neotropics (Janzen 1991) and subsequently for plant surveys (Baraloto et al 2007;Abadie et al 2008). Parataxonomy focused on the use of "morphospecies" to sort collected specimens into Recognizable Taxonomic Units (RTUs) (Cranston and Hillman 1992;Oliver and Beattie 1993) as a preliminary method of assessment in the absence of enough taxonomic expertise.…”

Assessing biodiversity in arable farmland by means of indicators: an overview

“…This led some authors to propose parataxonomic approach which assess the diversity by sorting living organisms into morphologic groups (Duelli and Obrist, 2003). This approach remains very controversial (Abadie et al, 2008). Lindenmayer and Likens (2011) analysed in a very exhaustive way the use of measured biodiversity indicator.…”