2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2013.03.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of predictor–corrector method for coupled Monte Carlo burnup codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 below. The geometry and compositions applied in this model are presented in detail in the article by [7] and also very similar model has been applied in the study by [6]. Both descriptions are sufficient for reproducing our results and the model is representative for commercially applied PWR reactors.…”
Section: Test Model Of Pwr Assemblymentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 below. The geometry and compositions applied in this model are presented in detail in the article by [7] and also very similar model has been applied in the study by [6]. Both descriptions are sufficient for reproducing our results and the model is representative for commercially applied PWR reactors.…”
Section: Test Model Of Pwr Assemblymentioning
confidence: 54%
“…More advanced coupling schemes such as predictorcorrector variants (described by [6]) takes into account the variation of neutron source intensity and reaction rates. The simplest solution is application of an average values from the beginning and end of each step as an effective input for transmutation coefficients.…”
Section: Bias Of Numerical Burnupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies proposed and investigated many coupling methods to evaluate these effects. Numerical instabilities were observed for example in various explicit approaches (Kotlyar and Shwageraus, 2013). Alternative methods (Kotlyar and Shwageraus, 2014) were suggested to address the stability issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies by Kotlyar and Shwageraus (2013) presented the effect of such coupling scheme choice on numerical stability and accuracy of the results. Therefore, new coupling methods have been developed for MC-burnup applications which also account for the dependence of reaction rates on thermal hydraulic conditions (Kotlyar and Shwageraus, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The depletion solver calculates material changes over a time-step with fixed microscopic reaction rates; this part requires solving the Bateman depletion equations. These two parts are then combined to a burnup calculation and solved in a sequential manner using so-called predictor-corrector algorithm [12,13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%