1999
DOI: 10.1109/70.795800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of scaling matrices for task-specific robot design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By choosing the elements of S J as free design parameters, the optimum robot geometry and actuator sizes are identified simultaneously. This has been shown in [25] to significantly improve robot performance, particularly with serial mechanisms.…”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By choosing the elements of S J as free design parameters, the optimum robot geometry and actuator sizes are identified simultaneously. This has been shown in [25] to significantly improve robot performance, particularly with serial mechanisms.…”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The matrix normalizing technique described in [25] is applied to the GII to obtain the workspace-inclusive, unitless, task-dependent performance measure shown in equation (11) where and are the minimum and maximum singular values of the Jacobian J(p,x) which is computed for a design parameter p at a position x in the workspace W and is scaled by matrices S J (12) and S T (13) which are diagonal matrices containing the maximum torque capabilities τ 1 ...τ n of each actuator (for a robot with n actuators) and the maximum required end-effector forces F and moments M about axes , and . …”
Section: Design Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While some comparison of the length scales of the task and environment have been used to inform the geometry and design of robotic platforms in the past [2] [3], generalizing this concept could prove useful for evaluating the fitness of preexisting robotic architectures, inviting the concepts of 'quasi-static mismatch' and 'dynamic mismatch'. Quasi-static mismatch, the inability of a robot to perform a task in a given environment using quasi-static methods, stems from either geometric constraints or inadequate thermally continuous torque density, while dynamic mismatch arises from insufficient energy or power density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assertion is investigated extensively and proved in [36,55,56,60,61]. Therefore, two separate performance indices are considered for the purpose of this paper, namely point-displacement and rotational kinematic sensitivity, which have been recently proposed to the end of alleviating the limitations of the above notorious indices [55].…”
Section: Review Of the Case-study: Moo Of The Point-displacement And mentioning
confidence: 99%