2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26532-2_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of Score Ratio with Distance-Based Classifiers in Biometric Signature Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was done so as to obtain a large and significant test set (183 elements) and a large ( H = 150 elements) cohort set. From the results in [6] , testing a cohort set size of 150 elements is not necessary, since the results do not improve those achieved with H = 50 and H = 100 . As a result, this size is not tested here.…”
Section: Experimental Setsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This was done so as to obtain a large and significant test set (183 elements) and a large ( H = 150 elements) cohort set. From the results in [6] , testing a cohort set size of 150 elements is not necessary, since the results do not improve those achieved with H = 50 and H = 100 . As a result, this size is not tested here.…”
Section: Experimental Setsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The corpus was split into three different subsets, as in [6] , but in a different and more realistic way, since the three subsets are completely independent here. In [6] , the elements from the cohort set not selected to perform the score ratio (i.e., those different from the N with the lower scores) were used for score normalization. This was done so as to obtain a large and significant test set (183 elements) and a large ( H = 150 elements) cohort set.…”
Section: Experimental Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations