2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40593-020-00200-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of Soft Computing Methods in Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics Research: a Review of Years 2010–2018

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Learning analytics has been widely researched and used in higher education institutions, especially due to the maturity level of adopting data analysis tools in these institutions ( Leitner et al, 2017 ; Waheed et al, 2018 ; Charitopoulos et al, 2020 ). However, despite some promising results, learning analytics does not have the same level of adoption in other educational contexts, such as high schools ( Cechinel et al, 2020 ; Ifenthaler, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learning analytics has been widely researched and used in higher education institutions, especially due to the maturity level of adopting data analysis tools in these institutions ( Leitner et al, 2017 ; Waheed et al, 2018 ; Charitopoulos et al, 2020 ). However, despite some promising results, learning analytics does not have the same level of adoption in other educational contexts, such as high schools ( Cechinel et al, 2020 ; Ifenthaler, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their core advantage is the generation of numerous distribution free and robust models, among which the most adequate and optimal model in a given sense can be selected. The following ML methods are widely used to model educational data: logistic regression, cluster analysis, decision trees (CART), support vector machines (SVM), multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), random forest (RF), neural networks (NN), fuzzy logic and others [10,24].…”
Section: Machine Learning Methods Used For Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of the family of regression trees, the CART and CART-EB methods we use can successfully deal with uncertainty, qualitatively stated problems and incomplete, imprecise or even contradictory data sets, as stated in [10]. These can process both nominal and numerical data, handle multidimensional and multivariety data, easily identify patterns and nonlinear complex relationships between the predictors, thus facilitating the interpretation of models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PPMI-SVD, on the other hand, uses the truncated singular value decomposition (SVD) technique to achieve dimensionality reduction, aimed at finding the maximum features to describe the semantics of words and the retained dimensional features to approximate the PPMI matrix composed of wordcontext information [6]. Charitopoulos et al point out that the SVD rank reduction algorithm does not guarantee the nonnegativity of the matrix decomposition, so nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) becomes a sensible choice for decomposing the PPMI, which guarantees the nonnegativity of the dimensional approximate reduction of the semantic relationship of the word-context information and is more consistent with the semantic relationship hypothesis [7]. Raveh et al demonstrated that matrix factorization methods are consistent with the word vectors of neural network language models in terms of task performance, such that PPMI-SVD matrix decomposition is equivalent to skipgram (SGNS) based on negative sampling [8].…”
Section: Current Status Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%