1985
DOI: 10.2307/2490925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Use of the Multivariate Regression Model in Event Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
153
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 317 publications
(157 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
153
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Secondly, it allows one to directly employ cross-sectional correlations in the test statistics, which is of particular importance in our case, where all firms share the same industry and the same event window. Since the stacked MVRM in equation (A.1) is a special case in the class of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR), traditional parametrical methodologies for testing joint hypotheses in SUR models can be directly applied and are discussed, e.g., in Binder (1985). All these methods rely on the assumption that the first t 1 − 1 rows (i.e., the rows corresponding to the estimation period) of the residuals ε = [ε 1 | · · · | ε g ] are independent and identically distributed, whereas the observations within each row may be cross-sectionally correlated.…”
Section: Appendix A: Model Estimation and Joint Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it allows one to directly employ cross-sectional correlations in the test statistics, which is of particular importance in our case, where all firms share the same industry and the same event window. Since the stacked MVRM in equation (A.1) is a special case in the class of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR), traditional parametrical methodologies for testing joint hypotheses in SUR models can be directly applied and are discussed, e.g., in Binder (1985). All these methods rely on the assumption that the first t 1 − 1 rows (i.e., the rows corresponding to the estimation period) of the residuals ε = [ε 1 | · · · | ε g ] are independent and identically distributed, whereas the observations within each row may be cross-sectionally correlated.…”
Section: Appendix A: Model Estimation and Joint Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify abnormal returns, we use a modified market model with a dummy variable (Izan, 1978;Dufour, 1980;Thompson, 1985;Binder, 1985;Binder, 1998) as shown in equation (7).…”
Section: An Event Study Methods To Identify Abnormal Returnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, it allows one to directly employ cross-sectional correlations in the test statistics, which is of particular importance in our case, where all firms share the same industry and the same event window. Since the stacked MVRM in equation (A.1) is a special case in the class of seemingly unrelated regressions (SUR), traditional parametrical methodologies for testing joint hypotheses in SUR models can be directly applied and are discussed, e.g., in Binder (1985). All these methods rely on the assumption that the first t 1 á 1 rows (i.e., the rows corresponding to the estimation period) of the residuals " ã ae" 1 | · · · | " g ç are independent and identically distributed, whereas the observations within each row may be cross-sectionally correlated.…”
Section: Appendix A: Model Estimation and Joint Hypothesis Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%