1989
DOI: 10.1109/20.34388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of the magnetic vector potential in the finite-element analysis of three-dimensional eddy currents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
210
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 641 publications
(211 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
210
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Different formulations using tree-cotree, or loop-tree decomposition [12][13][14][15][16], have to be sought when the frequency is low or the wavelength is long. Due to the low-frequency catastrophe encountered by E-H formulation, the vector potential formulation has become popular for solving low frequency problems [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. This work will arrive at a general theory of vector potential formulation for inhomogeneous anisotropic media, together with the pertinent integral equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different formulations using tree-cotree, or loop-tree decomposition [12][13][14][15][16], have to be sought when the frequency is low or the wavelength is long. Due to the low-frequency catastrophe encountered by E-H formulation, the vector potential formulation has become popular for solving low frequency problems [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. This work will arrive at a general theory of vector potential formulation for inhomogeneous anisotropic media, together with the pertinent integral equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem can be solved using the finite element method [27,28], finite difference method [29] or boundary element method [30]. The latter technique is known to be fast compared to FEM or FDM, since it only discretizes the boundaries of the background and the internal features, and can be found appropriate for a limited range of problems including shape reconstruction of objects with homogeneous material distribution, whereas FEM or FDM are more general however they require meshing the entire problem leading to larger number of unknowns [20].…”
Section: Forward Model and Sensitivity Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Applying Equation (3) into the Galerkin's approximation using edge element basis function [13][14][15] can yield…”
Section: Forward Problem -Eddy Current Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%