2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the use of the GP-NARX model for predicting hysteresis effects of bolted joint structures

Abstract: Structures joined by lap-joints can present complex nonlinear dynamic behavior as a function of the stress to which the lap-joint is subjected, including contact stiffness variations and softening, along with hysteresis effects related to frictional dissipation at the contact interface. Considering applications where the use of non-parametric models that depend only on input and output data is required, this work proposes and details the GP-NARX model's use to approximate systems' dynamics with hysteresis. Ini… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…When the random process is stationary, let ๐‘ก ๐‘— = ๐‘ก ๐‘– + ๐œ, and the 2-dimensional spectrum is following as ๐‘† ๐‘‹๐‘‹ (2) (๐œ” ๐‘– , ๐œ” ๐‘— ) = โ„ฑ [๐‘… ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ (2) (๐‘ก ๐‘– , ๐‘ก ๐‘— )] = 1 (2๐œ‹) 2 โˆฌ ๐‘… ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ (2) (๐‘ก ๐‘– , ๐‘ก ๐‘— )e โˆ’i(๐œ” ๐‘– ๐‘ก ๐‘– +๐œ”…”
Section: Generalized Pem For the Analysis Of Response Mpsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the random process is stationary, let ๐‘ก ๐‘— = ๐‘ก ๐‘– + ๐œ, and the 2-dimensional spectrum is following as ๐‘† ๐‘‹๐‘‹ (2) (๐œ” ๐‘– , ๐œ” ๐‘— ) = โ„ฑ [๐‘… ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ (2) (๐‘ก ๐‘– , ๐‘ก ๐‘— )] = 1 (2๐œ‹) 2 โˆฌ ๐‘… ๐‘ฅ๐‘ฅ (2) (๐‘ก ๐‘– , ๐‘ก ๐‘— )e โˆ’i(๐œ” ๐‘– ๐‘ก ๐‘– +๐œ”…”
Section: Generalized Pem For the Analysis Of Response Mpsdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linear dynamic models can be used only for small deformations with small amplitude vibrations or the inapparent nonlinear characteristics. More often, nonlinear dynamic models must be used to describe many practical situations, such as thin plate buckling problems [1], hysteresis effects from nonlinear constitutive relation [2], contact nonlinearity in bolted structures [3,4], and geometric nonlinearity from large deflection beams [5]. Nonlinear systems typically exhibit complex mechanical behaviour, such as the dependency of the natural frequency and dissipation with the input excitation amplitude, discontinuities in the frequency response function, and multi-harmonic response via a single harmonic *Corresponding author, E-mail: yzhao@dlut.edu.cn random vibrations, it will be a very interesting topic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of this regression model has been extensively investigated in SHM as it determines a robust model capable of describing the uncertainties involved in the process. 27 Teimouri et al 28 highlighted the benefits of the GPR model by comparing its performance with neural network models to determine the extension and location of damage in aircraft structures. Different damaged scenarios on a composite airfoil were tested to describe the impact of uncertainties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of this regression model has been extensively investigated in SHM as it determines a robust model capable of describing the uncertainties involved in the process. 27…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite numerous researches in this area, there are still many unanswered questions: which method is the best, how to automate all processes, and so on. According to the application type, there are two main directions of technical diagnostics: monitoring and diagnostics of rotating machinery, [1][2][3][4] and structural health monitoring (SHM), which is defined as a process of implementing a damage detection and characterisation strategy for various engineering structures. [5][6][7][8] According to the used technique, diagnostic methods can be divided into: destructive technique when maximum load or fatigue test of samples are performed 9,10 ; and non-destructive technique when the state of the structure is evaluated without causing damage to it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%