On the “usual” misunderstandings between econophysics and finance: Some clarifications on modelling approaches and efficient market hypothesis

Abstract

In line with the recent research and debates about econophysics and financial economics, this article discusses on usual misunderstandings between the two disciplines in terms of modelling and basic hypotheses. In the literature devoted to econophysics, the methodology used by financial economists is frequently considered as a top-down approach (starting from a priori "first principles") while econophysicists rather present themselves as scholars working with a (empirical data prone) bottom-up approach. Although this dualist perspective is very common in the econophysics literature, this paper claims that the distinction is very confusing and does not permit to reveal the essence of the differences between finance and econophysics. The distinction between these two fields is mainly investigated here through the lens of the Efficient Market Hypothesis in order to show that, in substance, econophysics and financial economics tend to have a similar approach implying that the misunderstanding between these two fields at the modelling level can therefore be overstepped.JEL classification: G1, B4, B5

An Econophysics Study of the S&P Global Clean Energy Index

“…Although we find that some of the indices/assets studied are more linked with a possible inefficient pattern, because the evidence of dependence is higher, this is not proof that those dependences imply some capacity of predictability in financial assets. In line with [59], we should exercise caution when analyzing the results, so when talking about efficiency, we intend to do so qualitatively. Nevertheless, it is still important to study financial market dependence, because these issues remain important for actual and potential investors, this being also a task for future research.…”

Relationship between Entropy, Corporate Entrepreneurship and Organizational Capabilities in Romanian Medium Sized Enterprises

“…Our study contributes to the limited number of empirical research on entropy in an organization setting by highlighting the boundary conditions of the impact by examining the moderating effect of firms' organizational capabilities and also to the development of Econophysics as a fast growing area of interdisciplinary science [38].…”

“…Entropy is new to the field of entrepreneurship, with only few studies focused on this research area of entrepreneurship and most literature only introduces the concept of entropy without directly modelling it in empirical studies [6,38,62,77].…”

“…The limitations of current conceptualizations of entropy in strategy and management lead us to introduce a heuristic systematic model and apply it to the analysis of entropy in the organizational setting [36][37][38]. This model proposes that conflicting interpretations of environment information motivate executives to engage in information searches, and they may co-occur and exert independent, additive, or interactive effects on judgment, with individuals' motivation and ability deciding which mode is more dominant (See Figure 1).…”

Assessing the Role of Strategic Choice on Organizational Performance by Jacquemin–Berry Entropy Index

“…This paper focuses on Small and Medium sized Enterprises (SMEs) and their increasingly more international strategies [9], seeking to use concepts from various scientific disciplines such as econophysics and finance [10][11][12][13], in a similar way with other authors [14,15], to assess organizational performance [16] in connection with diversification as a strategic choice employed by entrepreneurs.…”