2019
DOI: 10.1186/s13040-019-0200-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the utilization of deep and ensemble learning to detect milk adulteration

Abstract: Background Fraudulent milk adulteration is a dangerous practice in the dairy industry that is harmful to consumers since milk is one of the most consumed food products. Milk quality can be assessed by Fourier Transformed Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), a simple and fast method for obtaining its compositional information. The spectral data produced by this technique can be explored using machine learning methods, such as neural networks and decision trees, in order to create models that represent the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…whereas other techniques are able to achieves only less than 100%. • The proposed system able to detect five different adulterants with 100% of accuracy whereas, mostly other methods able to detect one or more adulterants.even [29] able to detect six adulterant, whose accuracy only 98.76% • Our developed system is portable, rapid, non-destructive and less expensive when compared to other systems.…”
Section: Figure 19 Five Class Confusion Matrix After Hyper Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…whereas other techniques are able to achieves only less than 100%. • The proposed system able to detect five different adulterants with 100% of accuracy whereas, mostly other methods able to detect one or more adulterants.even [29] able to detect six adulterant, whose accuracy only 98.76% • Our developed system is portable, rapid, non-destructive and less expensive when compared to other systems.…”
Section: Figure 19 Five Class Confusion Matrix After Hyper Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In [29] the milk adulterant testing using the Fourier Transform spectroscopy spectral analysis was carried out for five adulterants. Though it is non-non-destructive and rapid method, the experiments were tested in the lab set up and the equipment was expensive, non-portable and of higher wavelength region.…”
Section: Figure 19 Five Class Confusion Matrix After Hyper Parameter Tuningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas, in the FSVRG method, one full gradient computation is performed centrally, followed by many distributed stochastic updates over the distributed clients. More details about the D-2 dataset can be found in [48]. So, to set up similar settings as the FL-NNPLS method (i.e., 712/5 ≈ 140 samples per client), with the the FedAvg method, total seven clients were considered (960/7 ∼ 140 samples per client) and only 5 of them were contributed to the model updating process in each updating cycle.…”
Section: Centralized and Fl Performances With Nnpls Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In authenticity identification, the proposed method performed significantly better than single classification methods, such as partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM). Neto et al [17] applied deep learning and ensemble machine learning techniques to milk spectral data to predict common fraudulent milk adulterations that occur in the dairy industry. The proposed method outperformed both common single learning algorithms and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), which is a common technique used to determine sample composition in the dairy industry.…”
Section: Applications Of Ensemble Learning In Food Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%