1990
DOI: 10.1016/0165-7836(90)90058-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the validity and precision of back-calculation of growth from otoliths of the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a general way, the validity of the back calculation method depends on the accuracy of the age determinations and the selection of valid body sizeotolith size relationship (Rijnsdorp et al, 1990). Another good tool in the selection of the appropriated back calculation model (linear, curvilinear or other mathematical function) to describe body size and otolith size relationship is the verification of variances homogeneity through the plot of residuals vs. fitted data (Francis, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a general way, the validity of the back calculation method depends on the accuracy of the age determinations and the selection of valid body sizeotolith size relationship (Rijnsdorp et al, 1990). Another good tool in the selection of the appropriated back calculation model (linear, curvilinear or other mathematical function) to describe body size and otolith size relationship is the verification of variances homogeneity through the plot of residuals vs. fitted data (Francis, 1990).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measurements were all taken using the main axis of growth of the otolith.The length at the time of annulus formation L, was calculated according to where L, = length at capture; Oi = otolith diameter of the ith annulus in the otolith; 0, = diameter of the total otolith; a = proportionality coefficient; and P = backcalculation coefficient estimated from the relationship between fish length and otolith width (P = 1.364). Rijnsdorp et al (1990) presented evidence for the validity and accuracy of the back-calculation method and further showed that the time of annulus formation corresponds to 1 April.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lengthat-age was estimated by relating the proportion of the distance between growth zones relative to the total size of the otolith, to the length of the fish when it was caught. Evidence for the validity of the methods for ageing and for estimating length increments is given by Rijnsdorp et al (1990), including a discussion on their precision and accuracy.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%