2012
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2012.2211364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Validity of Approximate Formulas for the Evaluation of the Lightning Electromagnetic Fields in the Presence of a Lossy Ground

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Finite-Difference Time Domain (FDTD) approach (Yee, 1966) has been widely used for calculating lightning electromagnetic fields generated at different distances from as close as tens/hundreds of meters (Baba & Rakov, 2007a;Mimouni et al, 2008) to as far as hundreds to thousands of kilometers (Berenger, 2005;Tran et al, 2017). The FDTD approach is often employed as a reference method to validate approximate expressions proposed for the computation of lightning electromagnetic fields (e.g., Khosravi-Farsani et al, 2013;Shoory et al, 2011). It has also been used to evaluate the influence of the struck object (e.g., Baba & Rakov, 2008), the building on which field sensors are located (e.g., Baba & Rakov, 2007b), and irregular terrain (e.g., Kobayashi et al, 2016;Li et al, 2014;Li, Azadifar, Rachidi, Rubinstein, Diendorfer, et al, 2016;Li, Azadifar, Rachidi, Rubinstein, Paolone, et al, 2016;Oikawa et al, 2013;Soto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Finite-Difference Time Domain (FDTD) approach (Yee, 1966) has been widely used for calculating lightning electromagnetic fields generated at different distances from as close as tens/hundreds of meters (Baba & Rakov, 2007a;Mimouni et al, 2008) to as far as hundreds to thousands of kilometers (Berenger, 2005;Tran et al, 2017). The FDTD approach is often employed as a reference method to validate approximate expressions proposed for the computation of lightning electromagnetic fields (e.g., Khosravi-Farsani et al, 2013;Shoory et al, 2011). It has also been used to evaluate the influence of the struck object (e.g., Baba & Rakov, 2008), the building on which field sensors are located (e.g., Baba & Rakov, 2007b), and irregular terrain (e.g., Kobayashi et al, 2016;Li et al, 2014;Li, Azadifar, Rachidi, Rubinstein, Diendorfer, et al, 2016;Li, Azadifar, Rachidi, Rubinstein, Paolone, et al, 2016;Oikawa et al, 2013;Soto et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al [2013Li et al [ , 2014 have analyzed horizontal electric fields above a rough surface of lossy ground at distances of 50 and 100 m from a vertical lightning channel using the 3-D FDTD method. Khosravi-Farsani et al [2013] have computed, using the 3-D FDTD method, horizontal electric fields above and below the lossy ground surface at distances of 100 m to 2 km from a vertical lightning channel and compared the FDTD-computed waveforms with those computed using the Cooray-Rubinstein formula and the Norton approximation [Norton, 1937]. Mimouni et al [2014] have analyzed underground vertical and horizontal electric fields and azimuthal magnetic field within 100 m of the vertical lightning channel using the 2-D cylindrical FDTD method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, the 3-D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) is used for performing a full wave analysis of the problem (Elsherbeni and Demir, 2009;Khosravi-Farsani et al, 2013). To circumvent the computational issue associated with the high-memory requirement in this technique, we adopt the parallel processing approach together with a non-uniform meshing scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%